European Inventor Award survey. With six days still to go in the IPKat's sidebar poll on the European Inventor Award, over 430 responses have already been received, and nearly 40% of those responses agree with fellow Kat Darren's suggestion that the Award may actually be ultra vires. While there is still plenty of time for further expressions of opinion, and the current lack of enthusiasm for the event may not reflect the final result, it is plain that the Award is not viewed as a particularly useful or attractive event by a large proportion of people who spend their time and practise their skills in the social media's IP space. The poll can be found at the top left corner of this weblog's home page, together with a brief explanation. Do vote, whatever your opinion -- we'd love to know which view of the Award turns out to be the winner!
Dumb and Dumber? Thanks to Chris Torrero (katpat!) this Kat has learned from Ars Technica about a nasty surprise facing the Electronic Frontier Frontier (EFF) over its regular "Stupid Patent of the Month" (SPM) feature. Unlike the European Inventor Award, the SPM is not a coveted award for which contestants vie, though neither the Award nor the SPM is an indication of likely commercial success. But to cut to the chase: the April 2015 SPM award went to Scott Horstemeyer, an Atlanta attorney and inventor holding 28 patents, who has commenced legal proceedings against the EFF and its lawyer for defamation. Given that both the EFF and its adversary appear to be motivated by matters of principle, this dispute has the potential to run and run.
The IP Enforcement Directive: an event. This year's London seminar jointly held by the Journal of Intellectual Property Law (JIPLP) and leading German IP publication GRUR Int takes place on Tuesday 8 September in the Central London office of law firm Taylor Wessing. The theme is the impact -- if any -- of the EU's Intellectual Property Enforcement Directive on the enforcement practices of national courts in Europe. Speakers are Michael Edenborough QC and Wiebke Baars, and there will be the usual panel discussion, questions from the floor and refreshments. Admission is free. Click here for details.
Around the weblogs. "IP Licensing and Taxation: What is “transfer” in “transfer of right to use goods”?" asks J. Sai Deepak on his Indian IP blog The Demanding Mistress, concluding [to the relief of many readers, this Kat imagines] that the grant of a non-exclusive right to use a trade mark does not, in his opinion, amount to “transfer of right to use the mark”. IP Tango, via the excellent Patricia Covarrubia, records that Chile now has its very own protected prosciutto, while Afro-IP has been particularly busy: Kingsley Egbuonu is searching for influential African IP personalities to nominate for Managing IP's next Most Influential Persons list, while Isaac Rutenberg muses on utility models, giving a Kenyan perspective.
Brush Lee and friends ... |
Follow-up on the stoopid patent story:
ReplyDeleteA patent lawyer who sued the Electronic Frontier Foundation for defamation for writing about his invention in a "Stupid Patent of the Month" blog post has dropped the lawsuit.
"There was no settlement or agreement," EFF general counsel Kurt Opsahl told Ars in an e-mail. "It was a voluntary dismissal of a meritless lawsuit by Scott Horstemeyer."
The lawsuit, which was served on Monday and dropped on Thursday, named both the EFF and EFF lawyer Daniel Nazer, who authored the April blog post, as defendants.