Listening with rapt attention to the keynote address by Peter Groves ... |
Around the weblogs 1. On Afro-IP, Caroline Ncube reflects on what a busy month for IP the first two-thirds of November has been. IP Tango hosts a guest piece by Vicente Zafrilla Diaz-Marta (IP expert, Latin America IPR SME Helpdesk) on the Trans-Pacific Partnership and what it might mean for European businesses doing business abroad (in Latin America, for instance?) The Aistemos blog points readers to the ORoPO initiative, the establishment of an open register of accurate records of patent ownership that was launched six months ago and which looks forward to gathering momentum in the New Year.
Around the weblogs 2. Trade mark enthusiasts -- even those of the non-US variety -- are urged to take a look at "If infringement falls in a forest ...", Ron Coleman's Likelihood of Confusion post on, well, likelihood of confusion --one of the most thought-provoking items this Kat has seen on the subject in more than a little while. The SPC Blog, having recently posted a review of Japanese patent term extension law and practice by Seigen Tsukuda, has just hosted a sequel in which the Japanese Supreme Court affirms office practice on this valuable topic.
Following the note about the observatory, and the GfK survey, and thinking I might have something to contribute, I duly clicked on the link, to find that this advised that on being provided with an email address, an email would be sent. I provided the email address. The email came.
ReplyDeleteI clicked on the link on the email and was taken to the survey. The first question was along the lines of how many people work in your organisation, with four possible bands. The first was "1 to 9" so I clicked on the adjacent button.
To my extreme surprise this resulted in an immediate message along the lines that I did not meet their target group for the survey!
Leaving aside the irritation caused by the waste of time, there was no indication of what the target group was. More imponderably, does this mean that the survey will inevitably fail to pick up large quantities of valuable information from those who have it, such as SMEs, sole or small practitioners, academics, consultants and the like? If so, what confidence can one have in the outcome?
I have now posted this on Marques (sadly with a typo). If you can post on IPkat that would be appreciated.