As IPKat readers will
promptly recall, last May the EU Commission issued its Digital
Single Market Strategy (DSMS) [here and here].
In this document this EU institution promised policy and legislative action in
a number of areas, including copyright.
More specifically, in the area of copyright the Commission said
that it would launch initiatives to:
(1) get rid of geoblocking and ensure content portability [this would require
addressing the fact that, lacking an EU-wide copyright title, national
copyright laws are drawn along national borders];
(2) reform some exceptions, and introduce a new exception for text
and data mining for commercial and non-commercial purposes alike; and
(3) have a discussion (and possible reform) of the role of online
intermediaries and platforms in contrasting online copyright infringements.
For a while now there have been rumours that by the end of the
year the Commission would either issue legislative proposals or a new
communication on the steps to adopt in 2016.
Well, it would appear that both are going to happen sometime in
the very near future.
This Kat has just received a copy of a draft communication from
the Commission on a "modern, more
European copyright framework" from a Brussels insider and Katfriend
who wishes to remain anonymous [katpat!].
If adopted in its current form, by taking into account the outcome of the 2014 Public Consultation and
the report of the European Parliament on the
implementation of the InfoSoc
Directive, this draft Communication will "set out a plan that
includes targeted actions with proposals in the very short term, including a
proposal on the "portability" of online content services presented
together with this Communication, a set of proposals planned for 2016, and a
long-term vision."
|
Spring? It's the season of pretty things like legislative proposals |
What the Commission will do
Among other things and with particular regard to content
portability (or its lack thereof), in its draft communication the Commission
highlights how "[t]he territoriality of rights does not prevent
the granting of multi-territorial licences, but there are instances where
these are difficult or impossible to obtain. Right holders may decide to limit
the territorial scope of licences granted to service providers and, as a
result, services are limited to one or only certain territories."
In the area of exceptions and limitations, "[t]he general
objective is to increase the level of harmonisation, make relevant exceptions
mandatory for Member States to implement and ensure that they function across
borders within the EU."
With regard to online intermediaries and
platforms, the Commission is evaluating whether the safe harbour system should
be reformed at all.
In
the area of enforcement, the focus will be on the 'Follow the Money' strategy.
Overall the Commission will assess options and consider the need to
amend the legal framework in the area of IP enforcement by autumn 2016, inter
alia to clarify, as appropriate, the rules for identifying infringers, the
(cross-border) application of provisional and precautionary measures and
injunctions, the calculation and allocation of damages and legal costs.
|
Dreaming of a better copyright future? |
The
future?
As regards its long term strategy the Commission notes how:
"The full harmonisation of copyright in the EU,
in the form of a single copyright code and a single copyright title, would
require substantial changes in the way our rules work today. Areas that have so
far been left to the discretion of national legislators would have to be
harmonised. Uniform application of the rules would call for a single copyright
jurisdiction with its own tribunal, so that inconsistent case law does not lead
to more fragmentation.
These complexities cannot be a reason to relinquish
this vision as a long-term target. Notwithstanding the particularities of
copyright and its link with national cultures, difficulties and long lead-times
have also accompanied the creation of single titles and single rulebooks in
other areas of intellectual property, notably trademarks and patents, where
they are now a reality.
The EU should pursue this vision for the very same
reason it has given itself common copyright legislation: to build the EU’s single
market, a thriving European economy and a space where the diverse cultural and
intellectual production of Europe travel across the EU as freely as possible."
In a nutshell
Overall from the draft
document it would appear that the Commission will:
(1) Issue a legislative proposal on content portability in Spring
2016;
(2) Take steps to propose legislation that would implement the WIPO Marrakesh Treaty.
This would result in the adoption of a mandatory, harmonised EU exception
allowing for the making and dissemination, including across borders, of special
formats of print material to the benefit of people with print disabilities.
(3) Take action in the area of exceptions and limitations, for
instance in respect of text and data mining for public interest research
organisations.
(4) Clarify the scope of EU exceptions for teaching (with regard
to online remote learning), preservation, freedom of panorama.
(5) Consider if and how the current lack of harmonisation in the
area of private copying levies raises internal market issues.
(6) Consider whether action is needed on the definition of
the rights of ‘communication to the public’ and of ‘making available’.
(7) Consider a ‘follow-the-money’ approach, which sees the involvement
of different types of intermediary service providers.
Overall this Kat finds this document much bolder than the text of
the DSMS could have possibly anticipated, so she hopes that the Commission will
continue along this path.
You can access the text of the draft Communication from the
Commission here.
In this context, also the consultation on "Geo-Blocking and Other geographically based restrictions when shopping and accessing information in the EU" is worth mentioning. It's open until 28 December.
ReplyDelete-Sebastian
Small correction: the proposal on portability will accompany the communication in December. The initiative for Spring will concern general cross border access, i.e. not the special case of temporary cross border access (= portability). See grey box on page 5 in the draft communication (search for "spring" and read the para above).
ReplyDelete