Did you miss the last week of IPKat and are you now feeling lost? Never fear, Never Too Late 104 is here.
* Aspartame is back--and is Pepsi playing by a new branding playbook?
Neil Wilkof explains how brands like Pepsi walk the tightrope line between descriptive and distinctive marks in branding.
Neil Wilkof explains how brands like Pepsi walk the tightrope line between descriptive and distinctive marks in branding.
* The USPTO Moves to Clear "Trademark Deadwood"
New rules from the USPTO will require additional documentation to show that a mark is in fact in use. Mike Mireles explains the significance of the proposed changes and implications for the US.
New rules from the USPTO will require additional documentation to show that a mark is in fact in use. Mike Mireles explains the significance of the proposed changes and implications for the US.
The Court of Appeal upheld the decision of Arnold J, confirming that blocking injunctions are available against intermediaries in trade mark cases. This case will be discussed at our rapid response event on 28 July with Simmons & Simmons.
* An opportunity for IP scholars seeking future careers
The Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology, and Society (TILS) invites IP scholars to apply for MSCA (Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions) individual fellowships - the deadline is 14 September.
The Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology, and Society (TILS) invites IP scholars to apply for MSCA (Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions) individual fellowships - the deadline is 14 September.
* BREAKING: CJEU says that operators of physical marketplaces may be forced to stop trade mark infringements of market-traders
The CJEU in Tommy Hilfiger Licensing v Delta considered that an operator providing a service to third parties relating to the letting or subletting of pitches in a marketplace must be classified as an ‘intermediary’ and can be required to prevent infringements, as Eleonora Rosati explains.
* Book Review: The law and practice of trademark transactions - A global and local outlook
This book has done well to cover a range of practical topics, writes Emma Perot - the sections dedicated to trade mark transactions in Europe being particularly topical currently.
The CJEU in Tommy Hilfiger Licensing v Delta considered that an operator providing a service to third parties relating to the letting or subletting of pitches in a marketplace must be classified as an ‘intermediary’ and can be required to prevent infringements, as Eleonora Rosati explains.
This book has done well to cover a range of practical topics, writes Emma Perot - the sections dedicated to trade mark transactions in Europe being particularly topical currently.
* "Own Name" defence in Singapore--when "honest practices" does the heavy lifting
Katfriend Aaron Thng reports a recent case in Singapore which accepted that the "own name" defence is available to a corporation, contrary to the position in the EU (although the defence was not successful).
Katfriend Aaron Thng reports a recent case in Singapore which accepted that the "own name" defence is available to a corporation, contrary to the position in the EU (although the defence was not successful).
* Cartier rapid response event on 28 July: come join us!
Join us for a rapid response event to the Cartier decision upholding the validity of blocking injunctions against ISPs. You can register here.
* AG Wathelet advises CJEU to hold French law on out-of-print books incompatible with EU law
Amendments to the French IP code allowing collecting societies to authorise the digital exploitation of out-of-print books are not compatible with the Info Soc Directive, according to AG Wathelet's Opinion.
Join us for a rapid response event to the Cartier decision upholding the validity of blocking injunctions against ISPs. You can register here.
Amendments to the French IP code allowing collecting societies to authorise the digital exploitation of out-of-print books are not compatible with the Info Soc Directive, according to AG Wathelet's Opinion.
* MACCOFFEE? We're not lovin' it, says General Court
The CJEU upholds a decision to cancel a 'MACCOFFEE' trade mark on the basis that it was highly likely to be riding on the coat tails of McDonald's' marks. Nick Smallwood brings us this case.
The CJEU upholds a decision to cancel a 'MACCOFFEE' trade mark on the basis that it was highly likely to be riding on the coat tails of McDonald's' marks. Nick Smallwood brings us this case.
PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATE
Never too late 103 [week ending on Sunday 3 July] Publicity Rights v First Amendment | EU Trade marks Article 28 Declarations | Non-EU UK in the UPC? | Book review: IP Strategy, Valuation and Damages | Brexit and Copyright | In memoriam of David Goldring | Openness, innovation and patents
Never too late 102 [week ending on Sunday 26 June] | Neighbouring rights for publishers | US Supreme Court makes it easier to obtain patent enhanced damages | US Supreme Court in Halo and Kirtsaeng makes IP victory sweeter for successful parties | Enlarged Board publishes decision: EPO President violated judicial independence | Dear Europe... UK leaves the EU | Dear UK...
Never too late 101 [week ending on Sunday 19 June] Procedure to remove EPO Board Member ends abruptly | Trade mark "bully" | EU Trade Secrets Directive | Cannibalism, Branding and Market Segmentation | A-G Szpunar declares Rubik's Cube shape mark invalid | Apple and the podcast industry | IP Inclusive | Coke defends opposition to 'ZERO' marks
Never too late 101 [week ending on Sunday 19 June] Procedure to remove EPO Board Member ends abruptly | Trade mark "bully" | EU Trade Secrets Directive | Cannibalism, Branding and Market Segmentation | A-G Szpunar declares Rubik's Cube shape mark invalid | Apple and the podcast industry | IP Inclusive | Coke defends opposition to 'ZERO' marks
Never too late 100 [week ending on Sunday 12 June] 5G wireless technology | European Commission Update: Revised SPC tender now open | CJEU considers implemetation of the private copying exception | CJEU gives guidance for communication to the public cases | Google's fair use defence succeeds against Oracle | The state of patent valuation | EPO's plans to restrict post-service employment | Tuesday tiddlywinks (pirates and cake)| Is obscurity a greater threat than piracy? | Justice Slade delivers judgement in Arthur J Gallagher Services v Skriptchenko
Never Too Late: If you missed The IPKat last week
![Never Too Late: If you missed The IPKat last week]()
Reviewed by Ellie Wilson
on
Monday, July 11, 2016
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] Thou shalt not discriminate the Lego block over any other kind of product – GRUR speaks out on C-211/24](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWJYQUJNvYydrZcjwSHPuxd14xX3_48aBusHKBogY-Wg1BPSJSABbFFjmGiUV3aqG2npP9xYaIl1vtWK5AsqGOQPgRD2TWFLhyyc4xGm1fHDD-tt9kHcrSSgAyju2P9wSKz0VW6h7D5MD4Hxd9vREyxKYzlMRNXxxtxc3DiNsXppfVaxgSxAMV/s72-c/21742619125_7c9e53cd39_o.png)
![[Guest post] Comparison of wine and gin: the EUIPO’s unquestionable Similarity Tool](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNfTEBXiPVS0XjZi4mNE1OtXLxXiEp1PUgcUK7MMMXlfyTkO5SMXv-VCMXXNdS_F1XdMMxYca1VbBTGvvDeTVpo5x-5YwR7atQJmK3x32T8LACpf4308kht3nEtaxPwEPcGGrB0s5xjGktmQPOiVwPVLRO5JbW19qupc7xUtiVutvaWHow0OpBkA/s72-c/Picture%201.jpg)
![[Guest post] Muddying the waters of copyright – a rapid reaction to today’s IPEC decision which sees the sinking of the WaterRower’s claims for copyright protection](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7chFANC7ppmZl4_nlR6_hZEcg6cOhVEJNVXqki4p82BoVlcLFotuOXzHWYD5lKLiiK_kRoWeXmJjjaV2DpoKsAWq8U3LFioO5W_841a9gcfDIFjvZWcGqfnr0jWJNtyXptIYR_8bxCssaDkJ9KMokuSqy1g65Il7p2hPwo4MfRCEGoUPQJesvbg/s72-w400-c-h189/Screenshot%202024-11-11%20at%2018.20.45.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html