Too busy making a list and checking it
twice to keep up with IPKat this week? No problem, here is the 124th edition of
Never Too Early For Christmas References Never Too Late.
Festive Feline Level 100 |
The case of Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited v (1) Dr
Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited (2) Sandoz Limited [2016]
EWCA Civ 1053 was previously reported on the IPKat here (first instance)
and here (interim
application). This case whizzed through to the Court of Appeal in under six
months from the issue of proceedings and Eibhlin summarises the judgement.
Internkat
Tian brings us all the details of the 2nd EU-China IP Forum which she attended
in London on 8th November, organised by IP Key and
the Centre for Commercial Law Studies (CCLS),
Queen Mary University of London (QMUL),
with support from Renmin University of China (RUC).
The Journal of Intellectual
Property Law & Practice (JIPLP) conference will take place Monday,
16 January 2017 at the Simmons & Simmons offices in London. Register
here.
The 11th edition of the Pan-European
Intellectual Property Summit takes place on 1st and 2nd December at the World
Customs Organization in Brussels. Register here.
Kat friend Jeremy
Morton brings
a summary of The ItechLaw Association held its
European conference programme in Madrid on November 9-11.
David gives us an a roundup of what’s
been happening in relation to the European Qualifying Examination (EQE) for
prospective patent attorneys.
Southampton law student Stephen Barratt
provides a review of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) decision
in Microsoft,
a reference for a preliminary ruling from Latvia concerning the principle of
digital exhaustion as applied to computer programmes.
A review of the happenings in the IP
bloggersphere in Around the
IP Blogs and a of Sunday
Surprises including IPKat topping the list of the most popular copyright law blogs of
all time!
*** PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATE ***
Never
Too Late 123 [week ending on Sunday 20 November]
| Time for a Haar-cut - please do not relocate the Boards of Appeal of the
European Patent Office | Remember the House Ban? How two years flies past |
Gilead triumphant as Court of Appealupholds Arnold J in Idenix's Sovaldi appeal
|
BREAKING: CJEU follows AG and holds
French law on out-of-print books contrary to EU law | Again on the first
post-GS Media national decision | Top 5 things IP lawyers must remember
about English contract law | Monday Miscellany | Around the IP Blogs |
Never
Too Late 122 [week ending on
Sunday 13 November] | Is depositing better than
sequencing? | European Commission on Biotech Directive: tomatoes
about to be squashed? | The U.S. presidential election of 1876:
votes, cannabis and intellectual property| CJEU upholds duty to
reverse-engineer trade marks in Rubik's cube decision, but what about the
actual v abstract test? | BREAKING: CJEU says that EU law
allows e-lending| Around the Web Blogs| IP Publishers and Editors'
Lunch 2016!| Firings will continue until morale improves - Merpel revisits
the EPO|
Never
Too Late 121 [week ending on
Sunday 6 November] | Sunday Surprises | Firings will
continue until morale improves - Merpel revisits the EPO | Will too much of one
and not enough of the other spell bad news for innovation? | BREAKING NEWS
Brexit - High Court rules Government cannot Invoke Article 50 under Crown
Prerogative | Canada's new approach to diagnostic practices prompts division at
CIPO
Never
Too Late 120 [week ending on
Sunday 30 October] | Court of Appeal on Pregabalin -
Pfizer still in pain, but Swiss claims re-interpreted again | Procedural
fairness and the Penalties Regulation: R(Roche) v Secretary of State for Health
| Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part two) | AG Szpunar says that the notion of
"places accessible to the public against payment of an entrance fee"
does not apply to hotel rooms | Charlie Chaplin won't come back from the dead,
neither will Montis' copyright in the Chaplin chair | Linking to unlicensed
content: Swedish court applies GS Media | Urgent crowd sourcing request--
"ugly" clauses in IP agreements | How much attention should the IP community
give to non-compete clauses? | Friday Fantasies | Around the IPKat’s Cousins
Blogs
Never too late: If you missed the IPKat last week!
Reviewed by Hayleigh Bosher
on
Saturday, December 03, 2016
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html