A Californian Court may soon hear on the copyright infringement of a "Facebook-style" cooking video featuring a cupcake recipe. Last
week, internet chef Elizabeth LaBau, aka ‘SugarHero’, filed a copyright infringement
claim against Television Food Network before the Central District Court of
California. The crux of the dispute: LaBau's cooking video showcasing her flagship recipe “Snow Globe Cupcakes” (the complaint can be found here in full).
Snow Globe Cupcakes by SugarHero (shot of SugarHero's 'how to' video : www.sugarhero.com) |
The
complaint filed on LaBau’s behalf depicts a dispute by the likes of David and Goliath. The plaintiff is described as having dedicated “years
of hard work and late nights” to her project ‘SugarHero’, “competing with
numerous corporate food websites, often backed by large companies with deep
pockets” in a “oversaturated food market place”. To break through, LaBau worked
endlessly to develop “eye-catching” recipes paired with an effective social
media strategy (para 16). This is where the “Facebook-style video” at the crux
of this dispute comes in.
In
2014, LaBau developed her “Snow Globe Cupcake” recipe which was first published
on the SugarHero website (www.SugarHero.com)
(para 21). Though instantly popular, the recipe only went viral when LaBau
published the same recipe on Facebook using the regular post format (photo and
text) and linking it to the original recipe on her website (para 22). In 2016, LaBau produced a short cooking video of the recipe in “Facebook-style” to increase
traffic to her website further (para 24). The complaint describes that this
process took two months of production from the shooting to the editing, all of
which LaBau performed herself (para 25). Shortly after posting her clip on the
internet, SugarHero came across a similar video produced by Food Network, which
had been published on December 22, 2016. LaBau contacted the Network to request “credit
and attribution for her work, providing a link to her video for reference” (para
30).
The
complaint claimed that the “Food Network video” copied Labau’s work “shot-for-short”
(para 35) by reproducing protected elements of her clip such as “the choice of
shots, camera angles, colors, lighting, textual descriptors, and other artistic
and expressive elements of [LaBau]’s work” (para 28). SugarHero’s complaint
argued Food Network of free-riding on her “hard work”, “the time commitment of
recipe development and the cost of ingredients, coupled with the time cost of
photographing and videoing the cupcakes” which all in all amounted to a significant
investment on her part (para 35).
SugarHero's shot (left), Food network's shot (right) Source: BBC |
The
complaint covers the expected elements of copyright infringement for a
cinematographic work, and as such does not put forward anything out of the ordinary.
However, the decision may set an interesting precedent for the food industry -
should the case reach this stage. If the Californian court sides with LaBau,
the decision may re-open the doors of copyright protection in cases of highly-visual or
unique recipes recorded in ‘how-to’ videos by their authors. Would that be a welcome development? At any rate, it is a
timely conversation to hold as a case on sensory copyright (in the taste of
cheese) is making its way to the CJEU, unearthing with it the legitimacy of intellectual
property protection for culinary works (here).
SugarHero and the Snow Globe Cupcakes - Copyright and Food Videos
Reviewed by Mathilde Pavis
on
Wednesday, June 07, 2017
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html