BREAKING: AG Wathelet advises CJEU to rule that the taste of a cheese CANNOT be protected by copyright

Heks'nkaas (L) and competing and
allegedly infringing product W
itte WievenKaas (R)
Finally: the time has (almost) come to know the answer to one of the most pressing IP questions: is there, or not, copyright in the taste of a spreadable Dutch cheese known as Heks'nkaas?

This morning Advocate General (AG) Wathelet issued his Opinion [not yet available on the Curia website], in which he advised the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to rule that no copyright protection could vest in the taste of a cheese.

Despite its seemingly cheesy subject-matter, this case is potentially a very important one, as I discussed more at length here and here

Yes, the referral in Levola Hengelo, C-310/17 [the questions are available here] is asking the CJEU to clarify whether EU law precludes the taste of a food product — as its author's own intellectual creation — being granted copyright protection.

However, the case goes well beyond the realm of cheese. In fact, the Dutch court is also seeking clarification on a number of core copyright issues that, so far, have not been really addressed (if not incidentally and rather ambiguously) by the CJEU. 

In particular, the Dutch judge has asked the Luxembourg judges to weigh in on what qualifies as a protectable work, under Article 2(1) of the Berne Convention
  • What do we mean when we say copyright 'work'? 
  • How far can this notion stretch? 
  • Is the notion of work affected by the (possible) instability of a food product and/or the subjective nature of the taste experience? 
  • Also, does the system of exclusive rights and restrictions, as governed by Articles 2 to 5 of the InfoSoc Directive, preclude copyright protection of the taste of a food product?
Also the Kats are pondering the question ...
but a sample tasting
- accompanied by some salami - is required
According the press release, in today's Opinion AG Wathelet reasoned that: (1) the notion of 'work' only encompasses subject-matter that can be perceived through sight or hearing, but not other senses; and (2) subject-matter must be perceived with precision, stability and objectivity, and this would not be the case of the taste of a food product.

It follows that the creator of a food product cannot claim copyright protection in the taste per se, and - as such - does not enjoy any right to prevent unauthorised exploitation thereof.

A more detailed analysis will be provided once the text of the Opinion has been made available. Stay tuned!

[UPDATE at 12:30 pm BST: the text of the Opinion is now available here]
BREAKING: AG Wathelet advises CJEU to rule that the taste of a cheese CANNOT be protected by copyright BREAKING: AG Wathelet advises CJEU to rule that the taste of a cheese CANNOT be protected by copyright Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati on Wednesday, July 25, 2018 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.