With the
first self-driving vehicles (SDVs) likely to be commercially available by 2025,
it seems that the transport revolution is nearly upon us. Among the major players in this new emerging
market, we have the established automotive firms investing in digital
technologies, with an upcoming group of patent holders specializing in wireless communications and big data that are
of crucial relevance to SDVs.
The EPO
published, in November 2018 a report entitled “Patents and self-driving
vehicles” (find it here), which gives a very interesting
overview of the patent landscape in this important emerging field. The patents
and patent applications related to SDVs are divided into two main categories, the automated vehicle sector and the smart environment
sector. The former covers technologies that are embodied in the vehicle itself
(such as enabling vehicles to make autonomous decisions), while the latter
concerns technologies that allow SDVs to communicate with each other as well as
with their surroundings.
The patent
activity in these two sectors has increased by more than 330% since 2011. Among
the sources of patent applicants, Europe and the USA are leaders in SDV
innovation, while among European applicants, Germany is the most active country,
with 2151 applications during the years 2011 to 2017 while Sweden and France
follow with approximately 700 applications each. Japan, which was close behind the two leading jurisdictions
some ten years ago, has not been able to maintain its pace of growth since then. In fact, both the
Republic of Korea and the People’s Republic of China, with their first patent contributions
only as late as in 2013, are now catching up with Japan.
Patent
strategies reveal that applicants opt for an international coverage, choosing
either regional or international patent offices, and pursue protection in
several jurisdictions.
The increased
patent activity in SDV the field is reflected in the considerable investments made
in this sectors. Only in the US, for
example, more than 80 billion dollars was invested in the development of SDVs
between 2014 and 2017. What is especially
interesting is that traditional automotive companies have to compete with new market
entrants that have no history in the
automotive industry, but have a leading position in AI and communication.
In this connection, among the top patent
applicants in the SDV field are Samsung as number one, followed by Intel,
Qualcomm and LG, with Robert Bosch and Toyota fifth and sixth, respectively. Among
the top 25 patent applicants, half operate in information and communication
(ICT), while the other half act in transport and related industries.
This IPkat really likes an idea of self-driving cars |
The report
uses patent ownership rates in order to draw conclusions regarding the maturity of the market. In general, a
higher level of market concentration usually points to a more mature market, while lower levels are
signs of less consolidated markets. The SDV market seems to belong to the latter
category, with the top 10 applicants constituting
25% of the total patent applications,
while 60% are held by hundreds of smaller technology players.
The report reveals an upcoming revolution in the transport industry, not only with regards to technological solutions but also market structures. On the one hand, we see the need for traditional automotive players to collaborate with the new market entrants, being leaders in AI and communications, while at the same time important, indeed, revolutionary technology, is in fact owned by small players rather than the industry’s traditional leaders.
”Baby you can drive my car” period is over. Welcome the Self-driving vehicles.
Reviewed by Frantzeska Papadopoulou
on
Thursday, December 06, 2018
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html