Access blocked ... or not? |
Here’s what
Yannos writes:
The blocking order application was filed by EPOE,
an organization for the collective protection of audiovisual works representing
Greek film production and distribution companies Odeon, Seven, Feelgood
Entairtainment, Tanweer Alliances and the Greek Film Centre. These entities are
the licensees of rights in films produced Warner Bros, 20th Century
Fox, Paramount, Walt Disney Pictures, Universal and Sony Pictures for the Greek
territory. EPOE requested the blocking of several torrent, streaming and subtitle
websites providing access to infringing content.
Following this application and the notification
of a blocking request to all Greek internet access providers, the Commission
issued three separate decisions. The first two verify the compliance of two
specific access provider with the blocking request sent via email, the content
of which is however omitted from the text of the decisions. This means that it
is unknown to the public which websites were blocked by the providers in
compliance with the Commission’s request. Furthermore, the names of the providers
have been also erased from the published documents, so it is also unknown which two
ISPs complied voluntarily with the blocking request.
The third decision orders all internet access
providers, which are registered with the Greek Telecommunications and Post Commision [EETT]
as internet access providers and failed to comply with the blocking request
(that is over than 200 entities), to block 38 infringing websites, including
piratebay.org and popular Greek pirate website gamatotv.me,
xrysoi.online, tenies-online.com and liomenoi.com, within 48 hours.
Failure to comply with the order would result
in fines of EUR 850/day. The decision does not order any hosting or content
providers to remove infringing content, even though in its preamble the
decision expressively states that the Commission sent the blocking request to
“the hosting providers and to the administrators or owners of the infringing
websites, the contact details of which were accessible to the Commission” again
without clarifying which specific hosting providers, administrators or website
owners received the blocking request.
The Committee rejected EPOE’s request to order
the blocking of all future alternate URLs of these websites on the grounds of lack
of precision. As a result, most of the blocked websites just changed their top-level
domain and can be accessed easily again with a simple online search. Moreover, several websites published
walkthroughs for by-passing the blocking measures with the use of VPN and DNS
change. As a result, the blocking orders might prevent some traffic to
the blocked pirate sites, but tech-savvy users are still able to watch illegal
content without any problem.
First blocking orders issued in Greece ... but how effective are they?
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Sunday, December 09, 2018
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html