The IPKat team [including Merpel, of course] send their hearty congratulations to two newly-minted QCs with appropriately silky IP skills:
The recent appointees will no doubt be able to confirm or refute the accuracy of this artist's impression of the notoriously challenging QC appointment process.
- Andrew Norris (Hogarth Chambers), a trade marks specialist who was involved in (among others) the Jack Wills v House of Fraser and Fenty v Topshop cases; and
- James Segan (Blackstone Chambers), whose admirably broad practice takes in (among other things) IP and media matters, including the recent Conversant v Huawei and ZTE Supreme Court appeal.
The IPKat congratulates two new IP silks
Reviewed by Alex Woolgar
on
Thursday, January 16, 2020
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html