This Kat is delighted to contribute to the IP Education Series (Previous posts: Intro, #1, #2, #3 and #4) organised by Tosshan Ramgolam.
Last year I launched the Brunel Law School’s IP Pro Bono Service. In this post, I will talk about the launch event, the pro bono service going forward, the student experience and impact of the project so far.
Last year I launched the Brunel Law School’s IP Pro Bono Service. In this post, I will talk about the launch event, the pro bono service going forward, the student experience and impact of the project so far.
The launch Event and
IP Pro Bono Service
The launch was hosted at Brunel Law School in February 2019,
titled: Maximising Innovation with Intellectual Property. It was aimed at and
attended by creators, entrepaneurs, early start-ups with a focus on IP
education as a tool to utilise the value of innovation. Here is a summary video of the day!
The day was formed of two parts. The first part of the day
consisted of talks. I introduced the different types of IP and how they are
relevant to successful business. I highlighted the benefits of making
informed decisions and mitigating risks but understanding IP, the need to
conduct an IP Audit and develop a holistic IP Strategy. Here is a video of the talk.
Margaret Briffa, Leading Intellectual Property Lawyer at
Briffa, discussed the infamous story of the Trunki case, and the lessons learnt
such as the importance of early involvement of IP in the innovation process. Video here!
Nick Kounoupias, Chief Counsel Anti-Copying in Designs
(ACID) talked about the impact of IP on the development of a product and the
importance of having an IP strategy in place, particularly considering Design
rights.
Mandy Haberman, Inventor and Entrepreneur best known for the
ground-breaking Haberman Feeder and Anywayup® Cup, reflected on her experience
of enforcing her intellectual property against a competitor giant who copied
her invention, sharing valuable lessons. It’s a wonderful story, you can watch it
here.
Lastly, Philip Naylor, Patent Attorney from Carpmaels &
Ransford provided a more in depth understanding of patents and the patent
application process. Video here.
In second part of the day my IP students took Pro Bono meetings with over 20 London based businesses, supervised by Brunel Law School’s Pro Bono Co-ordinator, Anjali Kemwal and myself.
Before the meetings students had conducted research for
their assigned businesses and after the meeting students provided IP Audits and
Letters of Advice for their client, assisting them with issues around trade
mark, design, copyright, patents, trade secret and contract.
To prepare the students, I provided them with prompts for
research, help with how to conduct a client interview, and of course several
drafts of their letters of advice were needed (even with a template provided).
One thing that worked well was that I created a Whatsapp group for the
volunteering students, that was I only had to answer a question once! It also
created a forum for them to help each other.
Going forward we are continuing to offer IP Pro Bono in the form
of IP Audits and IP Helpdesk in the second Semester for our Intellectual
Property Law students (from Jan-June 2020). This will be more sustainable than coordinating all of
the meetings on one day, particularly as we have already received growing
interest from students and businesses.
[For anyone who would like to recive free IP advice, feel free to email or sign up directly through the IP Pro Bono service by emailing probono@brunel.ac.uk]
[For anyone who would like to recive free IP advice, feel free to email or sign up directly through the IP Pro Bono service by emailing probono@brunel.ac.uk]
Feedback from
Students
The feedback from students was heart-warming to say the least! I will paste a
few examples here:
Happy Kat! Image: Miss Nixie |
“Thank you for giving me this opportunity. It was a great
event and I l, personally learned from it a lot and it gave a great insight to
dealing with clients in practical life.”
“The IP pro bono was a really great experience. Problem
questions allow law students to apply law to fictitious individuals, but the IP
pro bono event allowed us to interact with real clients and give advice
regarding their IP concerns. Clients may use this information going forward in
their business and being able to contribute in some way is a satisfying
feeling.”
Impact and
reflections
Already the IP Pro Bono service has been recognised by
Brunel University London in the form of a College Teaching Excellence Award in
July 2019.
Essentially, the IP Pro Bono service offers a chance for
Brunel Law Students to gain experience working with real clients, whilst
providing valuable assistance to businesses on their intellectual property; a
win-win! In particular, some of the businesses reported that the information
from the students helped them to gain more from their business, and in other
situations avoid infringement and improve branding. The service is also provided in house to Brunel students who are studying subjects such as design, engineering, music and film.
Overall, I would say that honestly it was a lot of work
co-ordinating the students and businesses, but it was extremely rewarding. The
students really enjoyed the experience and have something to add to their
portfolio. The positive impact that the students had on their client’s
businesses gave the students a real sense of empowerment and achievement.
Several of the students have gone on to study further with a few working towards becoming Trade Mark Attorneys.
IP Education Series #5 : Brunel Law School IP Pro Bono Service
Reviewed by Hayleigh Bosher
on
Monday, February 03, 2020
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html