ERA and Maastricht University launch new European Patent Litigation Certificate

Student life presents its challenges ...

It looks like, after quite some time, the Unified Patent Court is soon to become a reality.

The always-busy Katfriends at the Academy of European Law (ERA) in Trier have thus informed The IPKat that they are launching – in collaboration with Maastricht University – a new European Patent Litigation Certificate (EPLC), which will run in person (in Trier) and online between September 2022 and July 2023.

The main goal of the EPLC is to provide European patent attorneys who are entitled to act as professional representatives before the EPO in accordance with Article 134 EPC to acquire the appropriate qualification to represent parties before the Unified Patent Court in accordance with Article 48 AUPC.

The IPKat has requested ERA to offer something special to interested Katreaders and managed to secure a 25% discount in the participation fee of one of the following conferences organized by ERA during Autumn 2022:
To enjoy the special Kat-discount, readers should use the code 2022patentlitigation, which can be combined with ERA’s standard early booking discount for one of the conferences above.

For more information and to register for the European Patent Litigation Certificate course, please click here.

ERA and Maastricht University launch new European Patent Litigation Certificate  ERA and Maastricht University launch new European Patent Litigation Certificate Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati on Thursday, July 14, 2022 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.