The IPKat has received and is pleased to host the following guest contribution by former InternKat James Kwong (Norton Rose Fulbright) on the recent Hong Kong copyright reform, which entered into force a few days ago. Here’s what James writes:
Hong Kong – Amendments to Copyright Ordinance with effect from 1 May 2023
by James Kwong
Following on previous posts on this issue (here and here), it is official: With effect from 1 May 2023, some major amendments to Hong Kong’s copyright legislation have come into effect.
By way of recap, the most salient features of the reform are the following.
1. Technology-neutral communication to the public right
The legislation as amended provides a technology-neutral exclusive right for copyright owners to communicate their works to the public through any mode of electronic transmission. This includes, for example, streaming of copyright music, movies, or dramatic works to the public for listening or watching on demand of live, and uploading of a copyright work to a website for access by the public.
Can you find the Kat? (Here for more Hong Kong shop Kats) |
To tie in with the introduction of a technology-neutral communication right, the legislation as amended also introduces criminal sanctions against those who make for-profit unauthorized communications of copyright works to the public, or to an extent which will cause prejudice to the copyright owners.
2. Safe harbour to online service providers (OSPs)
The legislation as amended introduces safe harbour provisions for OSPs, meaning that OSPs can potentially limit their liability for copyright infringement if they meet certain prescribed conditions such as taking reasonable steps to take down infringement materials when notified.
3. New copyright exceptions
New copyright exceptions have been introduced to:
- allow OSPs to cache content;
- allow media shifting of sound recording for private and domestic use; and
- provide greater flexibility to the education sector in communicating copyright works when giving instruction, and to facilitate libraries, archives and museums in their daily operations and in preserving valuable works.
4. New fair dealing exceptions
New fair dealing exceptions have been introduced to cover uses of copyright works for the purposes of:
- parody, satire, caricature and pastiche (do note that such terms will be subject to interpretation by courts as they are not defined in the legislation);
- reporting or commenting on current events; and
- making a quotation to facilitate the expression of opinions.
5. Additional statutory factors for the assessment of damages
Given the challenges in the digital environment, the legislation as amended has introduced two additional factors for consideration by courts when determining whether to award additional damages, i.e. (i) the unreasonable conduct of an infringer after having been informed of the infringement; and (ii) the likelihood of widespread circulation of infringing copies as a result of the infringement.
Concluding remarks
The amendments introduced to the copyright legislation are no doubt a positive step to keep up with the ever-changing technological developments in the world and are generally welcomed by the public.
This being said, as expressly stated in the Legislative Council Brief, more work would need to be done in the future to address new copyright issues (e.g., issues relating to AI and copyright), and the Government will embark on a new round of copyright review exercise to study issues that are yet to be addressed in the current amendment.
We remain hopeful that this amendment and any upcoming (Merpel: yet not too distant) amendments will continue to strengthen Hong Kong’s position as an IP trading hub in Asia.
[Guest post] Hong Kong – Amendments to Copyright Ordinance with effect from 1 May 2023
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Saturday, May 13, 2023
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html