If you missed last week's posts, it's not too late to catch up.
Hayleigh Bosher focused on the latest developments in the UK Economics of Music Streaming saga.
Anastasiia Kyrylenko reported that Spotify, Sony Music and Streamz have challenged Belgium’copyright reform in front of the Constitutional Court.
Chijoke Okorie reflected on a decision of the Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa concerning the use of a disclaimed feature.
Copyright
Eleonora Rosati reported that the artist Maurizio Cattelan prevailed in a copyright infringement lawsuit concerning his work “Comedian”.Hayleigh Bosher focused on the latest developments in the UK Economics of Music Streaming saga.
Anastasiia Kyrylenko reported that Spotify, Sony Music and Streamz have challenged Belgium’copyright reform in front of the Constitutional Court.
Trade marks
Marcel Pemsel commented on a judgment of the Higher Regional Court of Hamburg. The Court held that an injunction based on an EU trade mark with a reputation can only be granted for the entire EU territory or not at all.Chijoke Okorie reflected on a decision of the Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa concerning the use of a disclaimed feature.
Patents
Rose Hugues gave some thoughts on the preliminary opinion from the referring Board of Appeal on post-filed evidence appeal in T 0116/18.Other
Hayleigh Bosher reviewed the book titled “Intellectual Property Excesses: Exploring the Boundaries of IP Protection”.
Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!
Reviewed by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
on
Tuesday, June 20, 2023
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html