If you were barely holding on last week and didn't stay up-to-date with the IP news, here's the summary of what you missed.
A Kat barely holding on. Image from Pexels. |
Trade Marks and Designs
Anna Maria Stein commented the latest decision (T-537/22) about the validity of Lego's registered Community design for “Building blocks from a toy building set”. The invalidity arguments filed in the case concerned only one of the features, but the General Court stated that a design is invalid only if all its features are excluded from protection.
Patents and SPCs
Rose Hughes updated readers on the petition for review, following the final decision of the Board of Appeal in T 0116/18, based on the BoA's application of the order from the EBA in G 2/21 (which considered whether post-published evidence may be taken into account for inventive step). We will have to wait and see whether the EBA finds the petition for review admissible.
Marcel Pemsel analysed the CJEU's recent judgment on the Enforcement Directive's provision that a defendant must, in principle, be able to claim compensation for losses suffered as a consequence of a provisional measure. The case concerned the Finnish Market Court's grant of provisional measures against the marketing and sale of Mylan’s generic medicine, in the context of an action for infringement of a supplementary protection certificate (SPC). The CJEU held that a strict liability rule to be compliant with the Enforcement Directive.
Copyright
Hayleigh Bosher reviewed the new book, Copyright and Cartography: History, Law, and the Circulation of Geographical Knowledge, by Professor Isabella Alexander (University of Technology Sydney). The digital version is open access, and the review includes a discount code for IPKat readers to purchase the hardback.
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html