The IPKat has received and is pleased to host the following guest contribution by Katfriend Spyridon Sipetas (Stockholm University), tackling the IP implications of ‘brat’. You don’t even know what ‘brat’ means? Read on then!
The ‘brat’ phenomenon: Exploring cultural influence and IP dynamics
by Spyridon Sipetas
Summer 2024 has officially been proclaimed as ‘brat summer’.
While Charli xcx does not, so far, enjoy the commercial recognition of mainstream pop artists within the music industry, her influence appears to be vast, as her newest album release has sparked a cultural phenomenon. It has been noted that albeit the audience her music is addressed at is not the largest, it is the one that sets the trends - dictating what everyone else on the internet will be listening to and wearing in the foreseeable future. With the shift of the mainstream towards the niche (or the ‘niche-ification’ of the mainstream), she has managed -among other things - to establish slime green, as the it colour of the season - the alleged successor of last summer’s Barbie pink, creating a somewhat nuanced IP scenery around it as well.
Brat green: from the streets of NYC to the domination of social media and then to the catwalks (?)
Charli’s 6th studio album ‘Brat’, released on June 7th 2024, was promoted following a simple - yet, apparently, effective - approach: heavy use of a ‘radioactive’ shade of green, f.k.a. slime green (now ‘brat green’) in various means of advertising throughout the promotional campaign.
The colour was also used in the official album cover, creating a clear connection with the artist’s advertised work and the inauguration of the era it signalled.
The 'brat wall' and the 'bratmobile' |
As social media users quickly caught up with the association of the brat green colour with less conventional means of advertising, or items in general, suddenly everything even remotely similar to this slime green shade was denounced as ‘brat’ - from lime scooters to pharmacy cross signs.
This state of pandemonium across social media platforms swiftly led fashion brands and luxury retailers to capitalize on this frenzy by re-branding their green products as ‘brat’. Just to mention a few, UK luxury retailer Flannels distributed a brat green edit to buyers and the press, featuring items in the shade, from brands such as Coperni and Balenciaga. Meanwhile, New York brand Kate Spade posted a brat green starter pack on TikTok, promoting its own products in this colour, whereas beauty retailer Beauty Bay and beauty brand ColourPop seized the opportunity to advertise their green coloured products as ‘brat’ on their social media accounts.
The brat green craze was, nevertheless, not restricted within the sphere of fashion and beauty. Leading up to the UK’s general election on July 4, the Green Party designed a brat green graphic mimicking the album cover, replacing the word ‘Brat’ with the message ‘Vote Green’.
Brat valuation
As Vogue Business reports, since the album's release in June, Brat has produced $22.5 million in media impact value (MIV), according to Launchmetrics, which assesses the value of brand or individual posts, article mentions, and social media interactions. Over the past fortnight, searches for items in the brat-style ‘slime green’ have increased by 17%, according to global shopping platform Lyst.
According to Vogue,
In the tradition of Bottega Veneta’s Kelly green, Valentino’s PP pink and Gucci’s Ancora red [IPKat here], Charli xcx has taken complete ownership of a colour that is already an ambient presence in modern life.
The IPKat, brat-style (created with the brat generator) |
Exploring the IP intricacies of the ‘brat’ aesthetic
It is argued that ‘brat is more of an attitude rather than an aesthetic’. Exploring the latter case, nonetheless, might be more practical and could present several complexities from an IP perspective.
First of all, one would need to differentiate between the potential for IP protection of the entire brat aesthetic as a style, which could arguably not be protected by copyright (something contradictory to the fact that there is an explicit exception for that - i.e. the provision regarding pastiche in Art. 5(3)(k) of the InfoSoc Directive 2001/29) from the possibility to register ‘brat green’ as a colour mark.
From a trade mark perspective, managing to register a single colour per se, is a daunting yet not impossible task (see the Libertel case, as well as the relevant discussion on the protectability of signature colours as trade marks on The IPKat here). Nonetheless, providing evidence of acquired distinctiveness in order to fulfil Art. 7(3) of the Trade Mark Regulation (2017/1001) is an endeavour several major brands have failed in (a notable example being Louis Vuitton – 'Damier Azur', T-275/21, concerning a pattern rather than a colour; see the case commentary on The IPKat here). Obviously, applying for the registration of the colour in conjunction with the graphic representation of the album title would increase the chances of the application succeeding - while simultaneously significantly decreasing the trade mark’s scope of protection.
On-trend brat attire |
All the above said, it is understandable that the ‘brat’ era’s subject matter from an IP perspective cannot be confined to the music, the cover’s colour, or its intentionally lo-res Arial Narrow font; it is a mixture of all these elements that are inextricably linked. Focusing on brat green from a trade mark perspective, however, provides an opportunity to assess a case where the ‘proprietor’ of a signature colour seeks its widespread adoption rather than its monopolisation, in order to allow the trend they sparked to explode into a cultural phenomenon. Embracing this ‘open use’ of the colour both by brands and retailers attempting to re-brand and promote their products as ‘brat-coded’ enhances community engagement as well as fan loyalty, due to the sense of ownership and participation in the cultural movement associated with the colour and the overall aesthetic created among the audience.
This perfectly explains why Charli xcx has thus far endorsed extensive use of both brat green and the word ‘brat’ even in commercial contexts - a strategy which has proven highly successful in terms of cultivating hype around the ‘brat-verse’, elevating it to stratospheric levels. Should she decide to change her approach and seek trade mark registration (or enforcement), though, she may have to tackle genericide claims, due to its extensive use fostered by her current marketing strategy. In any case, her strategic embrace of widespread adoption over exclusivity, has propelled ‘Brat’ into a cultural touchstone, highlighting a novel approach to IP in the digital age - a bold move setting a precedent for how colour branding can transcend traditional boundaries.
[Guest post] The ‘brat’ phenomenon: Exploring cultural influence and IP dynamics
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Friday, July 12, 2024
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html