Wrapping up another year filled with IP, here is what you might have missed from last week!
Book Review
Jocelyn Bosse reviewed the book “Research Handbook on the History of Trademark Law,” edited by Lionel Bently (University of Cambridge) and Robert G. Bone (University of Texas). This new book provides insights into various methods for conducting historical research on trade mark law and is divided into three parts.
Trade marks
Marcel Pemsel reviewed a recent decision of the General Court concerning Art. 102(1) EUTMR, that is: the “Correction of errors and manifest oversights” in the context of a dispute concerning French trade mark ‘SOHO’. This mark has been registered since 1987 for ‘spirits, liqueurs and notably cocktails and cocktail bases’ in Class 33.
Former GuestKat Nedim Malovic (ASSA ABLOY) looked into a recent decision of the EUIPO Cancellation Division regarding a trade mark registration for ‘TESLA’ in Europe. The EUIPO’s decision is based on bad faith and highlights the Office’s firm stance against trade mark trolling, also underscoring the importance of genuine intent and commercial rationale when registering a trade mark.
Plant Varieties
Jocelyn Bosse reviewed the legal developments and future expectations concerning plant variety rights. Our Kat also provided updates on several developments around the world, including in Armenia, India, Canada, and Aotearoa/New Zealand.
Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!
Reviewed by Asude Sena Moya
on
Monday, December 30, 2024
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html