After much anticipation, we are ready to announce this year's winners of the IPKat Book of the Year Awards!
Best Patent Book
Terrell on the Law of Patents, 20th edition
Sweet & Maxwell
by Andrew Waugh KC, Douglas Campbell KC, Tim Austen, Tom Hinchliffe KC, Tom Mitcheson KC
Best Copyright Book
The Routledge Companion to Copyright and Creativity in the 21st Century
Routledge
eds. Michelle Bogre and Nancy Wolff
(reviewed by The IPKat here)
Best book on Trade Mark Law
Research Handbook on the History of Trademark Law
Edward Elgar
Lionel Bently and Robert G. Bone
(reviewed by The IPKat here)
Best Book on Design Law
Designs Law and Practice, 3rd ed
LexisNexis Butterworths
Jeremy Drew and others
Best Foreign Language (Non English) Intellectual Property Book
Carl Heymanns Verlag
Ströbele, Hacker and Thiering
Intellectual Property Law Book of the Year
Fairness In Intellectual Property Law
Edward Elgar
Annette Kur, Nari Lee, and Anna Tischner
Congratulations to this year's winners! We thank our readers for their votes and invite all of you to continue reading (and writing) IP books so that next year this beloved tradition returns to The IPKat's pages.
IPKat Book of the Year Awards 2024 winners announced!
Reviewed by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
on
Friday, February 14, 2025
Rating:
Reviewed by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
on
Friday, February 14, 2025
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html