![]() |
You can stretch your paws as much as you like, but do not misappropriate the Katcontent! |

![]() |
You can stretch your paws as much as you like, but do not misappropriate the Katcontent! |
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html
This is a sad and unfortunate change. Creative Commons licenses are far more permissive and useful for those who mean to do well with the content. Will this mean that content published under CC license before this change will be denoted as such? My understanding is that once a work is licensed under CC it can not be revoked.
ReplyDeleteI fully understand the restriction imposed and it had to be done. Why should AI creators be allowed to poach on contents of the blog for free just to train their machines?
ReplyDeleteA subsidiary question, does the restriction also apply to comments published on the blog? In other words, does content mean everything published on the blog, not just the blog entries.