It was a lively week on the IPKat, with a set of posts full of insights worth your attention. In case you didn’t catch everything, here’s your round-up:
Fordham IP Conference
Katfriends Sarah Bui and Seth B. Pearson took us to the Upper West Side for the 33rd Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2026), organised by the Hansen IP Institute at Fordham Law School.
Sarah reported on the opening session, Government Leaders’ Perspective on IP, emphasising WIPO’s evolving role, the AI-driven modernisation of IP systems, and the need for stability and predictability in global IP regimes.
Seth followed with his top five insights from the Data Governance, Privacy and Cybersecurity session, focusing on regulatory divergence across jurisdictions, the falling cost of cyberattacks, and the increasing role of lawyers as translators between law and technology.
Seth also provided five takeaways from Blended Session 4D: Designs, highlighting the procedural split between U.S. and EU design systems, the rise of trade-dress-driven fashion litigation, the cultural normalisation of “dupes”, the ongoing battles over functionality, and the new pathways aimed at protecting traditional and indigenous creative heritage.
Trade Marks
Katfriend Thomas Hood analysed the recent dispute concerning a coexistence agreement in C & J Clark International Ltd v Trek Bicycle Corporation and Anor [2026] EWHC 659 (Ch).
Designs
Marcel Pemsel reviewed Stone on European Union Design Law: A practitioners’ Guide (Oxford University Press, 2025), authored by David Stone — a future-proof book for practitioners in Europe and beyond who work with EU design law.
Unfair Competition
Marcel also examined the German Supreme Court’s Google Ads case (I ZR 28/25), in which the Court considered whether a retailer can be held liable for unlawful advertisements that Google placed on third-party platforms.
News, Events and Opportunities
Jocelyn Bosse highlighted a range of miscellaneous developments, events and opportunities from the IP world.
Photo by Emre Gencer from Pexels.
Fordham IP Conference
Katfriends Sarah Bui and Seth B. Pearson took us to the Upper West Side for the 33rd Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2026), organised by the Hansen IP Institute at Fordham Law School.
Sarah reported on the opening session, Government Leaders’ Perspective on IP, emphasising WIPO’s evolving role, the AI-driven modernisation of IP systems, and the need for stability and predictability in global IP regimes.
Seth followed with his top five insights from the Data Governance, Privacy and Cybersecurity session, focusing on regulatory divergence across jurisdictions, the falling cost of cyberattacks, and the increasing role of lawyers as translators between law and technology.
Seth also provided five takeaways from Blended Session 4D: Designs, highlighting the procedural split between U.S. and EU design systems, the rise of trade-dress-driven fashion litigation, the cultural normalisation of “dupes”, the ongoing battles over functionality, and the new pathways aimed at protecting traditional and indigenous creative heritage.
Trade Marks
Katfriend Thomas Hood analysed the recent dispute concerning a coexistence agreement in C & J Clark International Ltd v Trek Bicycle Corporation and Anor [2026] EWHC 659 (Ch).
Designs
Marcel Pemsel reviewed Stone on European Union Design Law: A practitioners’ Guide (Oxford University Press, 2025), authored by David Stone — a future-proof book for practitioners in Europe and beyond who work with EU design law.
Unfair Competition
Marcel also examined the German Supreme Court’s Google Ads case (I ZR 28/25), in which the Court considered whether a retailer can be held liable for unlawful advertisements that Google placed on third-party platforms.
News, Events and Opportunities
Jocelyn Bosse highlighted a range of miscellaneous developments, events and opportunities from the IP world.
Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!
Reviewed by Kliment Markov
on
Thursday, April 16, 2026
Rating:
Reviewed by Kliment Markov
on
Thursday, April 16, 2026
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html