If you, much like the Kats, spent the past few days taking a well-deserved Easter nap to sleep off the chocolate, you will be pleased to know it was a relatively quiet week on the blog too. Here is a bite-sized roundup to gently ease you back into the IP world.
International IP & Trade Law
Katfriend Seun Lari-Williams examined the outcomes of the WTO's 14th Ministerial Conference in Yaoundé, observing that the voluntary Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA) is increasingly shifting from a temporary stopgap to a permanent, two-tiered reality for resolving international TRIPS and IP disputes.
Katfriend Daniel J. Gervais reflected on a quieter but highly consequential outcome from the same WTO conference: the expiration of the TRIPS non-violation and situation complaints (NVSCs) moratorium. He warned that this lapse removes a quarter-century of settled expectations and leaves a genuinely novel, unpredictable legal terrain for the global IP system.
Copyright
Katfriend Norbert P. Flechsig scrutinised Advocate General Szpunar’s Opinion in VG WORT (C-840/24), arguing forcefully that there is no basis in EU law for collecting societies to divert revenue from private copying or public lending to fund cultural activities that benefit non-rightholders at their own discretion.
IP News and Events
Marcel Pemsel rounded up the latest news and opportunities for the Easter break, highlighting upcoming seminars on IP transactions, posthumous rights, and AI, alongside the EUIPO's new Digital Services Act collaboration to fight online counterfeiting and the 30th anniversary of the EU trade mark system.
Image credit: Gemini AI
Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!
Reviewed by Simone Lorenzi
on
Wednesday, April 08, 2026
Rating:
Reviewed by Simone Lorenzi
on
Wednesday, April 08, 2026
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html