Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Söğüt Atilla, Oliver Fairhurst, Claire Gregg, Georgia Jenkins and Marcel Pemsel.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Jocelyn Bosse (Book Review Editor).

InternKats: Wissam Bentazar, Simone Lorenzi and Kliment Markov.
Results for Asia Correspondent
DABUS in China: So far, it is 0–2 DABUS in China: So far, it is 0–2 Reviewed by Tian Lu on Friday, May 17, 2024 Rating: 5
Chinese court deems AI-generated image has copyright – Assessing the possibly over-hasty ‘spring breeze’ case Chinese court deems AI-generated image has copyright – Assessing the possibly over-hasty ‘spring breeze’ case Reviewed by Tian Lu on Wednesday, December 27, 2023 Rating: 5
[Guest post] Conference Report: Fifth IP & Innovation Researchers of Asia Conference [Guest post] Conference Report: Fifth IP & Innovation Researchers of Asia Conference Reviewed by Tian Lu on Tuesday, March 07, 2023 Rating: 5
Supreme Court of China casted punitive damages upon post-settlement-agreement repeated patent infringement Supreme Court of China casted punitive damages upon post-settlement-agreement repeated patent infringement Reviewed by Tian Lu on Thursday, February 23, 2023 Rating: 5
[Guest post] New Ukrainian Law on Copyright and Related Rights [Guest post] New Ukrainian Law on Copyright and Related Rights Reviewed by Tian Lu on Tuesday, January 24, 2023 Rating: 5
‘Whole whole whole’ - T-358/21 – Assessment of the food industry’s genuine use evidence ‘Whole whole whole’ - T-358/21 – Assessment of the food industry’s genuine use evidence Reviewed by Tian Lu on Friday, December 23, 2022 Rating: 5
When foreign geographical names meet the domestic public – HMPTN WATER v CNIPA When foreign geographical names meet the domestic public – HMPTN WATER v CNIPA Reviewed by Tian Lu on Wednesday, November 30, 2022 Rating: 5
C-256/21 – CJEU’s interpretation of counterclaims and EU trade mark courts’ jurisdiction C-256/21 – CJEU’s interpretation of counterclaims and EU trade mark courts’ jurisdiction Reviewed by Tian Lu on Wednesday, October 19, 2022 Rating: 5
Spill the tea, drastically – the tea trade mark with adverse effect case in China Spill the tea, drastically – the tea trade mark with adverse effect case in China Reviewed by Tian Lu on Monday, September 26, 2022 Rating: 5
Perfume N°5 v N°9: Chanel won an unfair competition case in China Perfume N°5 v N°9: Chanel won an unfair competition case in China Reviewed by Tian Lu on Friday, January 14, 2022 Rating: 5
First-ever Chinese civil code adopted at national legislature: no 'IP section', yet still relevant First-ever Chinese civil code adopted at national legislature: no 'IP section', yet still relevant Reviewed by Tian Lu on Sunday, May 31, 2020 Rating: 5
Punitive damages introduced into the Draft of the Amended Copyright Law of China Punitive damages introduced into the Draft of the Amended Copyright Law of China Reviewed by Tian Lu on Tuesday, May 26, 2020 Rating: 5
Subscribe to: Posts ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.