The whistle has blown on the World Cup and, with half the planet glued to the group stage, you would be forgiven for letting your IP reading slide somewhere between kick-off and full time. But while the rest of us argued about offside, the IPKat was busy running its own international fixtures, sending readers to Brazil, Canada and the EU all in a single week. Here is what you missed.
Copyright
Katfriend Luiz Guilherme Valente explored Brazil's newly adopted Dance Professionals Act and the surprise tucked into its fine print - a revived prohibition, echoing a near-forgotten 1978 rule, on assigning authors' and related rights, reopening the long-unsettled question of whether performers' rights can be bought out at all in the streaming age.Plant Variety Rights
Jocelyn Bosse reported on a busy year for plant breeders' rights in Canada, walking through what may be the country's first ever PBR infringement decision, a refreshing change from the patent battles of Schmeiser lore, alongside a freshly published set of regulations that quietly rewires the law.Trade Marks
Marcel Pemsel commented on the EUIPO Grand Board of Appeal's ruling that George Orwell's "ANIMAL FARM" and "1984" stumbled at the registration stage for content-related goods, in a neat paradox where the titles turned out to be too successful as books to work as trade marks.
News and Events
Marcel Pemsel also rounded up the week's IP miscellany in Saturday Sundries, flagging upcoming events - including a session on FRAND/SEP strategy and PMAC-UPC mediation under the UPC - together with assorted news from the EPO, UKIPO and beyond.
Never Too Late : If you missed The IPKat last week !
Reviewed by Wissam Bentazar
on
Saturday, June 20, 2026
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html