Artificial Intelligence
Patents
Rose Hughes analysed the differing US and European approaches to functional antibody claims and the interpretation of routine work by a skilled person, in light of the recent Teva v. Eli Lilly Federal Circuit decision.
Designs
Marcel Pemsel provided a list of takeaways from the recent General Court judgment in Crocs v EUIPO – Gor Factory (Chaussure) (T‑228/25).
Trade Marks
Marcel Pemsel reported on the General Court’s judgment in Les Éditions Albert René v EUIPO (T‑24/25), drawing a few takeaways on the challenges of protecting fictional characters, the impact of relevant‑public findings, and the evolving relevance of the ® symbol use.
Söğüt Atilla Aydın commented on a recent decision of the EUIPO’s Fifth Board of Appeal, which considered whether the mark TOUCH YOUR BOOBS is contrary to public policy or accepted principles of morality.
Geographical Indications
Katfriend Rebeca Ferrero Guillén reviewed Análisis Jurídico de la Denominación de Origen Protegida --El caso del queso manchego (Legal Analysis of the Protected Designation of Origin -- The Case of Manchego Cheese) by Anastasiia Kyrylenko.
Copyright
Söğüt Atilla‑Aydın reviewed Giulia Walter’s Art and Copyright Law: An Interdisciplinary Study on Interpictoriality (Routledge, 2025) -- a study of how artists’ reuse of existing works interacts with copyright rules.
Competition Law
Oliver Fairhurst examined the UK Court of Appeal’s decision in Deckers v Up & Running (UK) Ltd, centering on whether brands may impose limits on retailers’ online sales channels.
Miscellaneous
Claire Gregg highlighted a range of news, events, and opportunities from the IP world.
Photo by Hassan Bouamoud from Pexels.
Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!
Reviewed by Kliment Markov
on
Friday, June 05, 2026
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html