Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Söğüt Atilla, Oliver Fairhurst, Claire Gregg, Georgia Jenkins and Marcel Pemsel.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Jocelyn Bosse (Book Review Editor).

InternKats: Wissam Bentazar, Simone Lorenzi and Kliment Markov.
Results for UK patent decisions
UK divergence from the EPO on plausibility (Sandoz v BMS), Part 2: Interpretation of G 2/21 UK divergence from the EPO on plausibility (Sandoz v BMS), Part 2: Interpretation of G 2/21 Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Thursday, July 20, 2023 Rating: 5
UK divergence from the EPO on plausibility (Sandoz v BMS), Part 1: Is the "plausibility" test the same for both sufficiency and inventive step? UK divergence from the EPO on plausibility (Sandoz v BMS), Part 1: Is the "plausibility" test the same for both sufficiency and inventive step? Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Thursday, July 20, 2023 Rating: 5
Subscribe to: Posts ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.