Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Söğüt Atilla, Alessandro Cerri, Oliver Fairhurst and Marcel Pemsel.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Jocelyn Bosse (Book Review Editor).

InternKats: Simone Lorenzi and Asude Sena Moya.
Search results for 3(1)[(e)(ii)
Nestlé v Cadbury: on mixing and matching grounds for exclusion under Article 3(1)(e) Trade Marks Directive Nestlé v Cadbury: on mixing and matching grounds for exclusion under Article 3(1)(e) Trade Marks Directive Reviewed by Mark Schweizer on Tuesday, September 08, 2015 Rating: 5
Nestlé's Kit Kat: a one-sided debate? Nestlé's Kit Kat: a one-sided debate? Reviewed by Jeremy on Sunday, September 27, 2015 Rating: 5
The CJEU (again) on 3D trademarks: the Gömböc judgment The CJEU (again) on 3D trademarks: the <em>Gömböc</em> judgment Reviewed by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo on Friday, May 01, 2020 Rating: 5
BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that acquired distinctiveness requires that mark alone identifies relevant undertaking (but 'how' does not seem so clear) BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that acquired distinctiveness requires that mark alone identifies relevant undertaking (but 'how' does not seem so clear) Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati on Wednesday, September 16, 2015 Rating: 5
The new AG Opinion in Louboutin: is it really bad news for the famous red sole? The new AG Opinion in Louboutin: is it really bad news for the famous red sole? Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati on Thursday, February 08, 2018 Rating: 5
Subscribe to: Posts ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.