Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Söğüt Atilla, Oliver Fairhurst, Claire Gregg, Georgia Jenkins and Marcel Pemsel.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Jocelyn Bosse (Book Review Editor).

InternKats: Wissam Bentazar, Simone Lorenzi and Kliment Markov.
FED UP WITH LAWYERS? TRY THE TECHIES FED UP WITH LAWYERS? TRY THE TECHIES Reviewed by Jeremy on Friday, May 27, 2005 Rating: 5
WHAT'S BLACK, SHINY AND FULL OF DATABASE LAW? WHAT'S BLACK, SHINY AND FULL OF DATABASE LAW? Reviewed by Jeremy on Friday, May 27, 2005 Rating: 5
ARE THERE ANY ADIDAS STRIPE PUNS LEFT? ARE THERE ANY ADIDAS STRIPE PUNS LEFT? Reviewed by Anonymous on Friday, May 27, 2005 Rating: 5

TWO QUICK PATENT QUESTIONS

1. In search of patent cases. The IPKat regularly scans the OHIM and UK Trade Mark Registry websites for decisions on trade marks and desi...
- Thursday, May 26, 2005
TWO QUICK PATENT QUESTIONS TWO QUICK PATENT QUESTIONS Reviewed by Jeremy on Thursday, May 26, 2005 Rating: 5
COMPETITION CASE GETS A SPORTING CHANCE COMPETITION CASE GETS A SPORTING CHANCE Reviewed by Anonymous on Thursday, May 26, 2005 Rating: 5

OH BABY!

IPKat co-master Ilanah has just unearthed a CFI decision that she's been waiting for for ages. There's just one snag - no English tr...
- Thursday, May 26, 2005
OH BABY! OH BABY! Reviewed by Anonymous on Thursday, May 26, 2005 Rating: 5

WE SHOULD BE TOLD

There are now 73 cases listed on OHIM's Community Trade Mark Court Decision page, apparently drawn from seven countries. As this vertica...
- Wednesday, May 25, 2005
WE SHOULD BE TOLD WE SHOULD BE TOLD Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, May 25, 2005 Rating: 5

SPA CASE FALLS FLAT ON THE FACTS

No monopoly for Spa Monopole Also posted today is the Court of First Instance decision in Case T-67/04 Spa Monopole v OHIM, Spa-Finders Tra...
- Wednesday, May 25, 2005
SPA CASE FALLS FLAT ON THE FACTS SPA CASE FALLS FLAT ON THE FACTS Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, May 25, 2005 Rating: 5

IF IT WORKS, OPPOSE IT

The Court of First Instance's decision on the appeal in Case T-352/02 Creative Technology v OHIM, Ortiz was posted today. CT applied to ...
- Wednesday, May 25, 2005
IF IT WORKS, OPPOSE IT IF IT WORKS, OPPOSE IT Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, May 25, 2005 Rating: 5

THE IPKAT TRANSLATION WATCH

Case T-288/03 TeleTech Holdings v OHIM - Teletech International (TELETECH GLOBAL VENTURES) has been posted on the Curia website in all of ...
- Wednesday, May 25, 2005
THE IPKAT TRANSLATION WATCH THE IPKAT TRANSLATION WATCH Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, May 25, 2005 Rating: 5
Subscribe to: Posts ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.