Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / Jeremy Phillips / WHAT'S BLACK, SHINY AND FULL OF DATABASE LAW?

WHAT'S BLACK, SHINY AND FULL OF DATABASE LAW?

-

The May 2005 issue of Butterworths' LexisNexis Intellectual Property and Technology Cases has now been published. The print edition (which does indeed have a deliciously sleek black, shiny cover), ties in with this title's online service.

Black, shiny and much enjoyed by the IPKat ...

The cases reported in this issue are the four European Court of Justice rulings last November on the scope of database protection: cases C-203/02 British Horseracing Board v William Hill, C-444/02 Fixtures Marketing v Organismos Prognostikon, Case C-46/02 Fixtures Marketing v Oy Veykaus and Case C-338/02 Fixtures Marketing v Svenska Spel.
WHAT'S BLACK, SHINY AND FULL OF DATABASE LAW? WHAT'S BLACK, SHINY AND FULL OF DATABASE LAW? Reviewed by Jeremy on Friday, May 27, 2005 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. AnonymousTuesday, 4 October 2005 at 01:35:00 GMT+1

    Why would you want to marketing research your business hare at marketing research"\? With all the good ebook here you can't good wrong.

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.