ENTERTAINMENT LAW REVIEW

The April issue of Sweet & Maxwell's Entertainment Law Review is out. It contains the second and final part of Colin Nasir's long piece on the legal and technological solutions to the problems caused to copyright owners by file sharing, as well as a good article by Arnold Vahrenwald on the copyright aspects of ring tones and a note by James Hennigan (Hammonds) on the first of the O2 comparative advertising cases.
ENTERTAINMENT LAW REVIEW ENTERTAINMENT LAW REVIEW Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, May 04, 2005 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.