Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / / OHIM SCANDAL?

OHIM SCANDAL?


The IPKat is a creature of delicate sensibilities so, when reading an OHIM decision concerning morality and the scope of Art.7(1)(f) of the CTMR, he was astounded to discover that the Office had allowed BIG COCK & device to be registered. Had the Office taken leave of their senses, sozzled by the Spanish sun? What could be the nature of this device? The IPKat hated to think, but he had to know...

For your delectation and pleasure, the IPKat will post his findings tomorrow afternoon.
OHIM SCANDAL? OHIM SCANDAL? Reviewed by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 Rating: 5

2 comments:

  1. AnonymousTuesday, 31 May 2005 at 11:40:00 GMT+1

    Is the Kat afraid of a rooster ?

    This is the device of the TM registered by the OHIM.

    Now, dare I make the Kat blush, here are a couple of TMs, which consist in a pair of roustons.

    ReplyDelete
  2. JeremyTuesday, 31 May 2005 at 12:43:00 GMT+1

    Merci, Fréderic. The French may say "non" to a European Constitution, but there are some things they just can't refuse ... :-)

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.