The IPKat wants to know, why did the Patent Office posted the 2001 Inter Partes trade mark decisions on its website yesterday? All answers gratefully accepted...
* Listed as a "Top Legal Blog" in The Times Online, March 2011
* One of only two non-US weblogs listed in the 2010 ABA Journal Blawg 100
* Court Reporter Top Copyright Blog award winner, November 2010
* Number 1 in the 2010 Top Copyright Blog list compiled by the Copyright Litigation Blog, July 2010
* Selected by United States Library of Congress for inclusion in its historic collections of Internet materials related to Legal Blawgs 2010
* Top Patent Blog poll 2009: 3rd out of 50 in the "Favourite Patent Blog" poll and 2nd out of 50 in the "Most-read" poll
* ComputerWeekly IT Law and Governance Blog of the Year 20 August 2008
* Best of the Blogs, Times Online, 21 August 2008
* Listed as one of Managing Intellectual Property magazine's Fifty Most Influential People of 2005 and again in 2011
1 comment:
I needed to obtain a full copy of the CARTE BLEUE decision, but noticed that the Registry had withdrawn the text of the original decision from its website for the purpose of making amendments, and had not got around to replacing it. Only upon enquiries to the very helpful "Customer Care" department was the amended text retrieved and posted onto the website.
Jonathan Thurgood
Carpmaels & Ransford
Post a Comment