The New York Post reports that the battle between Eminem and owners of The Source magazine over the white rapper's racist lyrics will go to trial, a federal judge ruled yesterday. Manhattan federal Judge Gerard Lynch said he will have to hear all the facts before ruling on whether The Source violated the copyrights of Eminem's label, Shady Records, by publishing controversial excerpts of two songs — "Oh Foolish Pride" and "So Many Styles" — without permission. The dispute centers on lyrics that 32-year-old Eminem, whose real name is Marshal Mathers, wrote as a teenager. They include lyrics such as "black girls are dumb, and white girls are good chicks". The Source co-owners David Mays and Raymond Scott, who obtained copies of the songs, have accused Eminem of racism. Eminem, who has apologised for the lyrics, insists that The Source has nonetheless infringed his copyrights by publishing them.

Eminem: the penitent plaintiff -- but will the judge accept his plea?

The IPKat recalls that there was once a time when the fact that a work contained obscene, blasphemous or seditious content meant that, in the UK and the US, the courts would not assist in enforcing any copyright in it against an allegedly infringing third party. It would be good to put those old precedents on trial and see if they have any relevance in today's more relaxed atmosphere. Merpel adds: "So long as Eminem doesn't say anything bad about cats ..."

Cat references in Eminem lyrics here
RACIST RAP CASE TO GO TO TRIAL RACIST RAP CASE TO GO TO TRIAL Reviewed by Jeremy on Tuesday, January 04, 2005 Rating: 5


  1. It really has no bearing on the substance of the post, and I'm not sure what you were referring to anyways, but FYI: the song lyrics you linked to are not really for an Eminem song.

    It's a RAKIM song on the 8 Mile OST - I'm guessing they just have it listed as an Eminem album and thus the song was attributed to him.


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.