Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / / ADIDAS TRIUMPS AGAIN

ADIDAS TRIUMPS AGAIN

The Seattle Post reports that adidas has won a trade mark suit against Nike in Dusseldorf. The use by Nike and another manufacturer of two parallel stripes along the seam of trousers and jackets. This is the latest in a long line of litigation against big companies such as Ralph Lauren and Abercrombie and Fitch brought by adidas. "Really for us, this is business as usual - it may be Nike one day and another company another day," said an adidas spokesman.

The IPKat says that this just goes to show that big trade mark owners can be defendants in trade mark cases just as easily as they can be claimants. Merpel adds that it’s not clear whether adidas won on confusion-based infringement or dilution grounds – any help that the IPKat’s readers can give in clarifying this point would be appreciated.

More shocking examples of stripe-related trade mark infringement here and here
Find out what the IPKat did in celebration of this exciting new case here
ADIDAS TRIUMPS AGAIN ADIDAS TRIUMPS AGAIN Reviewed by Anonymous on Thursday, January 27, 2005 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. AnonymousThursday, 27 January 2005 at 08:26:00 GMT

    Hi IPKAT,

    I read about this in Handakte WebLAWg a couple of days ago, and there's an article in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung online.
    http://log.handakte.de/archiv/006030.shtml
    http://www.faz.net/s/RubC8BA5576CDEE4A05AF8DFEC92E288D64/Doc~EDAEF777F5E1A463D8A5AAB99952B380D~ATpl~Ecommon~Scontent.html

    The two defendants were Nike and Tom Tailor (Hamburg) - they both said the stripes were just decoration. The court found that they were a protected picture mark. The court was the Landgericht, which is a court of first instance for more serious matters, but it referred to similar decisions of the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice) and the Munich Oberlandesgericht (a court of appeal).
    (But apparently adidas lost twice at the European Court of Justice, once against Fitnessworld Training in the Netherlands and once against Marca Mode, presumably in Germany).

    adidas won this case on the basis that its picture mark was protected. I don't know if that answers your question - is this confusion-based infringement?

    Margaret
    www.margaret-marks.com/Transblawg

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.