It isn't often that you find an article on any aspect of intellectual property in the Journal of Business Law, but the January 2005 issue of this Sweet & Maxwell publication contains an extremely good one. The article, "Industrial Design and the Design Directive: Continuing and Future Problems in Design Protection?", is written by Gary Scanlan and Sarah Gale, respectively Reader in Law and Senior Lecturer in Law at City University, London. The article concludes:

"The purpose of the Directive was to achieve harmonisation of the law of industrial design throughout the Member States of the Community .... [I]t is unlikely that the Directive, as implemented, will achieve its purpose in all respects. Harmonisation is not ... the same as standardisation. Nevertheless, how the provisions of the Directive as set out [in the UK legislation] are to be reconciled with the provisions of the Community Design Regulation is a cause for consternation ..."

The IPKat thinks this is worth a read if you practise or study design law in the UK and have had those nagging doubts in the back of your mind as to how the pieces of the design protection jigsaw fit together.
HIDDEN ARTICLE ON DESIGN RIGHTS HIDDEN ARTICLE ON DESIGN RIGHTS Reviewed by Jeremy on Tuesday, January 11, 2005 Rating: 5


  1. came here strangely searching for uk phone and address search

    to my suprise your here.

    Good blog maybe you should add some uk phone and address search stuff on it might top your rankings, also when u search for uk phone and address search on this other search engine it dont show?

    Maybe you should add it uk phone and address search

    uk phone and address search

  2. Gooday Blogger, I was surfing around and came accross your post on this post quite by accident. Although it was not related to what I was searching for it somehow ads to ones list of lifes experiences.

    I sometimes have a soft spot for blogs related to story writing and /or sites that have a central theme around story writing type items.

    Once again Blogger, thank you for your post.

  3. a lot of premium products and services being offered for free. What’s best is that there is a seemingly


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.