COPYRIGHT: HOME AND AWAY


Home - duration for sound recordings

The IPKat draws his readers’ attention to a letter in Tuesday’s times comparing the copyright term for sound recordings with the much shorter term given to typographical arrangements in published editions and arguing that if one presented a business plan to a bank which stated that the investment would only be recouped after 50 years, one would be firmly shown the door.

The IPKat reckons that we just have to live with the fact that the relationship between copyright term and the amount of time that is needed to recoup investment in creative or entrepreneurial works will always be an imprecise science.


Away - major Australian copyright reforms

The Australian Attorney-General has announced a number of changes to Australian copyright law. The highlights are:

* The legalisation of ‘time-shifting’ of TV and radio broadcasts
*The legalisation of ‘format shifting’ e.g. music on CDs to MP3 players. This exemption isn’t limited to musical works, and would cover books and magazines too.
*New defences allowing schools, universities, libraries and other cultural institutions to use copyright material for non-commercial purposes
*Provisions to allow the disabled access to copyright materials
*A new parody/satire defence
*New enforcement measures to combat piracy.

The IPKat is partially jealous. It’s high time we in the UK had a format-shifting defence, not to mention a (narrowly drafted) parody defence. However, he fears that the Australian reforms haven’t been fully thought through. For example, the ‘time shifting’ defence only allows the user to view the time-shifted recording once, after which he is meant to destroy the recording. How, the IPKat asks, will enforcement officials be able to tell whether or not the recording has been viewed? Likewise, the format and time shifting defences are said to not give users the right to lend the copies to their close family and friends (although friends will be allowed to watch the programmes/listen to the music etc with the recorder). If the laws are restricted as strictly as they are drafted, this would mean the heavy involvement of enforcement officials in the lives of ordinary consumers making essentially private use of copyright works. This seems at odds with the stated aim that

‘Everyday consumers shouldn’t be treated like copyright pirates. Copyright pirates should be not treated like everyday consumers.’
COPYRIGHT: HOME AND AWAY COPYRIGHT: HOME AND AWAY Reviewed by Anonymous on Monday, May 15, 2006 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. The announcement seems keen to increase public awareness and education
    about
    piracy; but I reckon they will have a uphill struggle explaining to
    people
    the "wisdom" of why they will be allowed to, for example, take a
    commercial
    music CD they have purchased that has been recorded in one format and
    back
    it up into another format, but are not allowed to make a back-up in the
    original format.

    I can see no absolutely no sense in allowing the copying of an av.
    format
    video file if the copy is saved as a wmv. format file but not as an av.
    file. Especially as one could then presumably convert it back to an av.
    file
    at some later date, perhaps years later...

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.