Do you like designs and have some time to spare?If so, would you like to read and comment on a draft chapter of a book on the Agreement on Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) that deals with designs law? If the answer's still yes, follow the link to here.
Right: designs and TRIPs - one man's pleasure is another man's headache
Trademark World for MayThe May 2006 issue of Informa's ten-times-a-year Trademark World is full of jolly items, which is only to be expected from the issue that coincided with the International Trademark Association's 128th Annual Meeting earlier this month. The cover story, "When Dot Met Com", is an upbeat, bouncy piece by Philippa Edwards (Trade Marks Directory Service) on how brand owners can't afford to police the internet but can't afford not to police it either - well, that's the IPKat's spin on it.
There's also a more legal contribution from Pinsent Masons' Lee Curtis, who has taken time off from entering IPKat competitions in order to give a solid account of OHIM and UK practice regarding unused registered trade marks (the "abandoned vessels in the shipping lanes of trade", as Lord Justice Jacob poetically described them).
Merpel's choice is the precocious squash-playing law student Simon Teng's review of the recent European litigation in the MATRATZEN dispute. She's so pleased to see students writing: the youngsters of today are the venerable old commentators of tomorrow, so let's give them every encouragement.
DO YOU LIKE DESIGNS AND HAVE SOME TIME TO SPARE?; MAY TRADEMARK WORLD
![DO YOU LIKE DESIGNS AND HAVE SOME TIME TO SPARE?; MAY TRADEMARK WORLD]()
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Sunday, May 21, 2006
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html