SMELLS AND SOUNDS


The IPKat smells a rat

A Lithuanian company has applied to register the smell of freshly baked pizza as a trade mark according to the Washington Post.

"Opinion polls show that many consumers in Lithuania identify the pleasure of eating pizza with our trade mark," said Mindaugas Gumauskas, marketing director of the Cilija company. "This makes us believe that the scent of freshly baked pizza is a subject to our copyright."

The IPKat isn’t impressed. He very much doubts that the smell of pizza could be adequately graphically represented. Even if it could, he doubts if the smell of pizza would be capable of distinguishing the goods of one undertaking from those of other undertakings.


Online music services sued

Billboard reports that a whole load of online music services including Apple and Napster are in trouble over copyright. Euro Tec Publishing, Bruce Caplin, Prestoons Music and related companies, independent music publishers, have filed the action in the District Court of Los Angeles. Customary licences are available so that publishers cannot refuse to license previously recorded and released songs, but it is argued that the online music services did not comply with the requisite formalities.

The IPKat reckons that while this is serious, it doesn’t threaten the basic workings of the online music services.
SMELLS AND SOUNDS SMELLS AND SOUNDS Reviewed by Anonymous on Thursday, May 18, 2006 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. If someone succesfully trademarks the smell of freshly baked pizza, would that prohibit anyone else baking pizzas for sale within "nose-shot" of consumers?

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.