For the half-year to 30 June 2014, the IPKat's regular team is supplemented by contributions from guest bloggers Alberto Bellan, Darren Meale and Nadia Zegze.

Two of our regular Kats are currently on blogging sabbaticals. They are David Brophy and Catherine Lee.

Thursday, 13 August 2009

Nude litigants head for Chancery Division

The Press Association has reported that fashion designer Stella McCartney's company is facing legal action from Nude Skincare following a dispute over the use of the word "nude".
Stella McCartney Ltd had planned to release its new fragrance Stella Nude. However, Nude Skincare, run by eco-entrepreneur Bryan Meehan and Bono's wife Ali Hewson, have objected to the company's decision to use the word "nude" in the title of its fragrance. The proceedings, which are scheduled for an autumn airing in the Chancery Division of the High Court for England and Wales, are also being brought against YSL Beauté (part of L'Oréal), Stella McCartney's licensee.

Basenotes reports that Stella Nude "blends top notes of Moroccan rose and grapefruit with heart notes of white peony and pink pepper. The base features notes of Ugandan vanilla and grey amber".


The IPKat, who will keep an eye out for further developments, would like more legal detail, noting that Times Online's Law Central makes it appear that this is a trade mark dispute rather than passing off, and that the claimant is Nude Brands Ltd, rather than Nude Skincare.

Merpel is astonished at the number of trade marks in the UK/EU which contain the word NUDE. For example, Nude Brands Ltd has registered for goods and services in Classes 3, 4, 5, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 43 and 44: these include dental wax, beard dyes, meat, fish, poultry and game, preparations for destroying vermin, abrasive preparations (ouch!) ...

Tufty wonders, though: how did NUDE get through for massage and suntanning?

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Absent real nudity, it's surely deceptively misdescriptive ... or maybe it's meant to be perfume worn by nudists... ;-)

Anonymous said...

There is a hearing before Mr Justice Floyd at 2 p.m. on Monday 17 August. I don't know whether cats will be admitted to the public gallery.

Anonymous said...

The decision is now available at:

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2009/2154.html

Subscribe to the IPKat's posts by email here

Just pop your email address into the box and click 'Subscribe':