For the half-year to 30 June 2014, the IPKat's regular team is supplemented by contributions from guest bloggers Alberto Bellan, Darren Meale and Nadia Zegze.

Two of our regular Kats are currently on blogging sabbaticals. They are David Brophy and Catherine Lee.

Monday, 14 December 2009

Monday miscellany

Here's a little news of enlightened self-interest. The World Intellectual Property Organization has happily announced that Italy has given it an extra-budgetary contribution of €1 million, to cement good relations between the UN agency and the home of some of the world's tastiest geographical indications. Fortunately there are no strings attached to this gift, which is said to reflect

"... Italy’s commitment to consolidating and reinforcing its contribution to the activities of WIPO since the establishment of a funds-in-trust (FIT) program in 2007 to cover IP-related activities in developing countries and countries in transition".
It's not clear to the IPKat whether Italy counts as "developing" or merely "in transition, but
"Part of the funds announced by Italy will support the development of a Global IP-Based Entrepreneurship Program, an interdisciplinary pilot training program which would initially be hosted by an Italian University. The program will rely on the case studies of successful use of the IP system by SMEs in the OECD countries, notably Italy".

As of Thursday 10 December, the .eu domain has become available not only to those of use who use conventional Latin letters but to those who employ Greek and Cyrillic. According to OHIM we can now expect to see such truly (non)harmonised domains as www. διαδίκτυο.eu or www.роуминг.eu -- though many of us would prefer to click on them rather than sit there saying, "Ctrl Alt and er, ... what?" all the time.

Left: It's a good day for metaphors as the Rosetta Stone becomes the new Holy Grail for .eu registration





Now here's a brain-teaser from IPKat team member Mark: According to which criteria is the following list of IP organizations ordered:
1. AIPPI (Association Internationale pour la Protection de la Propriété Intellectuelle);
2. ECTA (European Community Trademark Association);
3. FICPI (Fédération Internationale des Conseillers en Propriété Industrielle);
4. INTA (International Trademark Association);
5. Union of European Practitioners in Intellectual Property.
If you know the answer, please don't email -- just post it below.

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

Évidemment, dans l'ordre alphabétique français de leurs noms en français (pas leurs acronyms)

Hakim said...

Alphabetical order

patently said...

Looks like alphabetic order to me....

pharmapatents said...

EVEN in Intellectual Property, Trademarks looks ODD.

Anna said...

Ditto - alphabetical ...

Mark Anderson said...

Where does OMPI come in the hackordnung?

Anonymous said...

Dare I say it but alphabetical ..

Annsley Merelle Ward said...

Or in alphabetical order and the following pattern....

1. IP organization
2. TM organization
3. IP organization
4. TM organization
5. IP organization

Anonymous said...

Come on folks. Being factually correct and obvious makes "alphabetical order" plainly not what IPKAT was thinking of. Could be numbers of members, oh, I can't be bothered. Life's too short.....

Anonymous said...

Isn't it even more obvious? They are in number order, 1 to 5...

Birgit said...

Hackordnung?! :-) I like a riddle.
How about thhe year(s) they were founded?

Subscribe to the IPKat's posts by email here

Just pop your email address into the box and click 'Subscribe':