For the half-year to 30 June 2014, the IPKat's regular team is supplemented by contributions from guest bloggers Alberto Bellan, Darren Meale and Nadia Zegze.

Two of our regular Kats are currently on blogging sabbaticals. They are David Brophy and Catherine Lee.

Thursday, 21 April 2011

Digital Economy Act Looks Set to Stay

It is not often that this particular Kat stumbles into the realm of the Administrative sub-division of the High Court, however when the occasion demands he is ready to take one for the team and roll up his furry sleeves to get to work. As reported in most of the main news outlets this morning, the Administrative Court, wearing the face of Mr Justice Kenneth Parker, handed down its judgment yesterday in R (on the Application of British Telecommunications Plc & TalkTalk Telecom Group Plc) v The Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2011] EWHC 1021 (Admin), concerning BT and TalkTalk's application for judicial review of the Digital Economy Act 2010. For those interested in the numbers, it took Mr Justice Parker just under 35,000 words, split into 265 paragraphs, to dismiss BT and TalkTalk's application on all grounds. The Kat hands over to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, which issued the following press release:
"The High Court today ruled in favour of the Government in a judicial review of measures to tackle online copyright infringement in the Digital Economy Act. Mr Justice Kenneth Parker upheld the principle of taking measures to tackle the unlawful downloading of music, films, books and other copyright material. BT and TalkTalk had brought the judicial review, claiming that the measures in the Act were not compliant with EU law and were not proportionate. The judge rejected the challenge.

The judicial review also considered the statutory instrument that splits the cost of the Act’s mass notification system between rights holders and internet service providers. The judge ruled ISPs could be made to pay a share of the cost of operating the system and the appeals process but not Ofcom’s costs from setting up, monitoring and enforcing it. The Government will now consider changes to the statutory instrument.

The Government has asked Ofcom to review section 17 of the Digital Economy Act. Ofcom are assessing whether the Act’s reserve powers to enable courts to block websites dedicated to copyright infringement could work in practice. They are due to report to the Government shortly.

Responding to the judgement, a DCMS spokesperson said:

“We are pleased that the Court has recognised these measures as both lawful and proportionate. The Government remains committed to tackling online piracy and so will set out the next steps for implementation of the Digital Economy Act shortly.”"

4 comments:

Emil A. Georgiev said...

"The Government remains committed to tackling online piracy...[]"

'Nuff said...

Michael said...

When I saw the headlines yesterday about the outcome of the JR, I died a little bit inside!! :-(

Will said...

Did they really stand much of a chance? While their arguments sounded fairly convincing at the time, they were all easily answered by the government.

It seems that the correct time and place for the ISPs to have challenged the DEA was over a year ago when it was being consulted on and passed through Parliament - but instead they supported the measures...

A Ali said...

A Mass notifications system may costly but must never be compromised!

Subscribe to the IPKat's posts by email here

Just pop your email address into the box and click 'Subscribe':