|Sir Terence Etherton|
Although he never sat in the Patents Court, Sir Terence has an impressive record of IP-related decisions, many (possibly all?) of which have been lovingly reported here on the IPKat. Highlights include:
- Lambretta v Teddy Smith, where Etherton J in the High Court ruled that there was no design right or copyright in the colourways of a track top
- Jacobson & Sons v Globe GB was a trade mark case relating to the flash on the side of Gola shoes - the registrations were held by Etherton J to be valid and infringed
- In Cook Biotech Incorporated v Edwards Lifesciences AG, Etherton LJ in the Court of Appeal gave the leading judgment rejecting the appeal and affirming the first instance decision of Kitchin J that Cook's patent for an artificial heart valve was invalid and not infringed
- In Microsoft v Motorola Etherton LJ again gave the leading judgment, upholding Arnold J and finding Motorola's patent relating to synchronisation of message statuses across multiple messaging devices invalid
- Etherton LJ also gave the leading judgment in rejecting Lundbeck's request (in their dispute against Resolution relating to escitalopram) that Arnold J recuse himself on the grounds that one of the expert witnesses had been the supervisor of his undergraduate chemistry research project at Oxford University
- In Generics v Yeda, on an aspect of the case relating to professional conflict for in-house lawyers, Ward L.J. had to adjudicate between what he called "the characteristically forceful common sense judgment of Sir Robin Jacob" and "the characteristically erudite judgment of Etherton L.J." The former advocated a strict application of a conflict rule for in-house lawyers, the latter a more relaxed one. Erudition and Sir Terence won the day.
- Turning his had to copyright, Etherton LJ gave the leading judgment in Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure, allowing the use of foreign decoding devices in pubs in this country.
- [Update 28 May 2016] A kind reader has pointed out that I omitted the procedural trade mark case Starbucks v British Sky Broadcasting / EMI v British Sky Broadcasting, reported by the IPKat here, which created the "Alicante Torpedo" in English law - if you receive a cease & desist, quickly file invalidity proceedings at the EUIPO, and the English proceedings must be stayed. This may not necessarily be regarded as a good thing...