NEW PROMOTIONAL METHODS A DOUBLE AGE SWORD FOR TRADE MARK OWNERS

AdAge reports on the “arsenal” of new promotional devices being used by marketers and retailers within supermarkets. The overwhelming choice of TV and print-based fora for advertising products has led to marketers seeking to turn the shopping experience itself into a branded experience. Examples include floors that talk, messages that swoop down from the ceiling and motion sensors that trigger on-shelf light shows, such as those piloted by the drinks brand Mountain Dew, which caused individual containers of the drink to light up bright green as consumers walked past the refrigerator in which they are stored.

This isn’t all good news for brand-owners though. Some shops, keen to promote their own-brands and afraid that an excess in marketing will cause the messages of the promotions to be lost in a form of “instore spam” have implemented “clean store” policies, strictly regulating promotions by brand owners. Nonetheless, such promotions are valued in view of the widely cited fact that 70% of buying decisions are made at the point of purchase which translate into profits not only for the brand owner but also for the retailer. Moreover, promotions that push a particular brand often end up stimulating sales for the product category as a whole.

The IPKat is fascinated by the ever more innovative ways brand-owners find to use their trade marks, though he warns that, as certain supermarkets have recognised, over-promotion could negate the effect a trade mark has if everyone else is using the same methods to promote their goods. The message will simply get lost in a sea of advertising that consumers will just blank out.

Floors that talk here and here
Instore spam here
Some promotion Mountain Dew could do without here

NEW PROMOTIONAL METHODS A DOUBLE AGE SWORD FOR TRADE MARK OWNERS NEW PROMOTIONAL METHODS A DOUBLE AGE SWORD FOR TRADE MARK OWNERS Reviewed by Unknown on Tuesday, February 10, 2004 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.