This week's Sunday Telegraph carries a salutary article on the American talent for spotting an opportunity to spot a promising monopoly. The opportunity in question relates to the currently fashionable ugg boot, an Australian invention and, judging by its appearance, a hot fashion accessory if ever there was one. To Australians the ugg is a generic term, more a part of their rugged culture than a fashion statement. But Deckers, a Goleta, California-based company, is apparently cleaning up on the IP rights in the word mark UGG and has already stopped the sale of generic non-Deckers uggs on eBay. Deckers has now reportedly obtained trade mark rights for UGG in some 25 countries.
The IPKat observes that "ugg" is defined in that authoritative Australian work, the Macquarie Dictionary as "a fleecy-lined boot with an untanned upper". If this definition is anything to go by, it is likely that any infringement action brought by Deckers will be keenly defended. Meanwhile, he notes the complaints of indigenous Australian ugg-makers and takes comfort from the fact that it's not just poms who whinge...
Puss in boots here, here and here
Ugg and Eee here
The IPKat observes that "ugg" is defined in that authoritative Australian work, the Macquarie Dictionary as "a fleecy-lined boot with an untanned upper". If this definition is anything to go by, it is likely that any infringement action brought by Deckers will be keenly defended. Meanwhile, he notes the complaints of indigenous Australian ugg-makers and takes comfort from the fact that it's not just poms who whinge...
Puss in boots here, here and here
Ugg and Eee here
AUSSIES WHINGE AGAINST UGGLY AMERICANS
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Tuesday, March 02, 2004
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html