The BBC reports that Diageo has agreed with the Scotch Whisky Association to stop selling Cardhu Pure Malt, a whisky containing a mixture of whiskies from more that one distillery. In future it will stick to producing Cardhu Single Malt, which contains only whisky distilled at the Cardhu distillery. Diageo has decided that in future, only single malts (i.e. whiskies from a single source) will be sold under the names of distilleries. Diageo was heavily criticised by fellow distillers and whisky-lovers alike when it decided to sell a blended whisky from various distilleries under the name Cardhu Pure Malt, after demand for the single malt outstripped supply (see IPKat 28 October 2003 and 8 December 2003 )
The IPKat says that the name of a single malt is a relatively uncommon example of a trade mark which (i) is geographically descriptive and (ii) doesn't just guarantee that the goods sold under itare of consistent quality but also guarantees that those goods come from one specific source.
More whisky battles here and here
Solve your whisky supply problems here
The IPKat says that the name of a single malt is a relatively uncommon example of a trade mark which (i) is geographically descriptive and (ii) doesn't just guarantee that the goods sold under itare of consistent quality but also guarantees that those goods come from one specific source.
More whisky battles here and here
Solve your whisky supply problems here
ONE FOR THE ROAD
Reviewed by Anonymous
on
Tuesday, March 09, 2004
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html