GARAGE DOOR DECISION CLOSES DOOR ON DMCA


The Register and ZD News report that the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has dismissed an appeal brought by the Chamberlain Group claiming that universal garage-door opening produced by Skylink infringed the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Chamberlain argued that Skylink’s openers gave consumers access to the copyrighted firmware in Chamberlain's Liftmaster line of garage door openers by bypassing the “rolling code” that was meant to prevent access to the copyright-protected code. However, the Court was unimpressed since consumers using Skylink’s openers only want to open their doors and not to commit copyright infringement.

According the judge who wrote the decision of the Court of Appeals:
"Chamberlain's proposed construction would allow copyright owners to prohibit exclusively fair uses even in the absence of any feared foul use…Copyright law itself authorizes the public to make certain uses of copyrighted materials. Consumers who purchase a product containing a copy of embedded software have the inherent legal right to use that copy of the software. What the law authorizes, Chamberlain cannot revoke."
The IPKat welcomes this common sense decision. To say that copyright-type protection should be effectively able to bar consumers from access their own homes is laughable. The interest recognised here seems to be that, if you buy a piece of equipment, you should be able to get replacement parts that enable you to carry on using it when something goes wrong without IP rights getting in the way. This reminds the IPKat strongly of the stance taken by the House of Lords in the UK in British Leyland v Armstrong.

History of garage doors here
Garage doors of the fourth dimension here, here and here
GARAGE DOOR DECISION CLOSES DOOR ON DMCA GARAGE DOOR DECISION CLOSES DOOR ON DMCA Reviewed by Anonymous on Thursday, September 02, 2004 Rating: 5

2 comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.