Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Antonios Baris (Book Review Editor), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / / IPKAT QUESTION: TRADE MARK BULLIES

IPKAT QUESTION: TRADE MARK BULLIES

The IPKat wants to know, what happens if I wrongfully use bullyboy tactics to persuade my competitors that they need to obtain a licence from me to use a symbol (X) even though legally they don't and, because of my efforts, the symbol acquires distinctiveness and consumers eventually view the mark as being my badge of origin. Does my misbehaviour earn me a valid trade mark registration?

As ever, please post your answers as comments below, or email them to theipkat@yahoo.co.uk.
IPKAT QUESTION: TRADE MARK BULLIES IPKAT QUESTION: TRADE MARK BULLIES Reviewed by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 21, 2004 Rating: 5

2 comments:

  1. JeremyTuesday, 21 September 2004 at 12:44:00 GMT+1

    I think the bully gets away with it, from a trade mark point of view. If the relevant consumer now sees the symbol X as being distinctive of the bully's goods or services, I don't see how the CTM Regulation or the Harmonisation Directive can be invoked so as to prevent the mark's registration.

    The bully's application certainly doesn't fall into the category of bad faith and, while his behaviour may be outrageous, it has to be the mark that is contrary to public policy or morality, not the behaviour of the applicant, if the application is to fail.

    The best the bullied licensee can hope for is for his licence to be vitiated for coercion or duress. Also, if the bully has a dominant market position, he may be acting in breach of Art.86 EC - but none of this affects the registrability of the bully's trade mark.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousThursday, 23 September 2004 at 11:01:00 GMT+1

    Electrocoin seems relevant here?

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.