BUT ARE THEY PART OF THE PRIOR ART?

The IPKat's friend Darren Smyth has drawn his attention to the following announcement by the European Patent Office:
European Patent Office recognises same-sex marriage whenever validly contracted in one of the member states

Munich, 17 November 2004 - The European Patent Organisation has come to a conclusion on the recognition of same-sex marriage whenever validly contracted in one of the member states.

In view of the difficulties inherent in this issue, the European Patent Office saw a need to initiate a consultation process with its member states. “On 28 October, EPO President Alain Pompidou received the position of the member states. The consultation process was already welcomed by the delegations", said Roland Grossenbacher, Chairman of the EPO's Administrative Council, its governing body.

The Administrative Council had urged the European Patent Office to treat same-sex marriages that have been validly contracted in one of the member states in the same way as it does heterosexual marriages.

The Office has committed itself, when interpreting the Service Regulations, to adopt the view expressed by the Administrative Council as soon as possible.
What does this recognition by the EPO mean? Do same-sex marriages that are recognised by the EPO have to be recognised by the Patent Offices of European Patent Convention Member States? Readers are left to draw their own conclusions.
BUT ARE THEY PART OF THE PRIOR ART? BUT ARE THEY PART OF THE PRIOR ART? Reviewed by Jeremy on Thursday, November 18, 2004 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. with no damage to your business’ budget whatsoever.

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.