THE HUNTER AND THE HUNTED: MPAA SEEKS TO PICK OFF ITS QUARRY


The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), a trade group representing seven major movie studios, has filed a bunch of lawsuits against individuals they say are offering pirated copies of films using Internet-based peer-to-peer file sharing programs, reports Findlaw. As yet it is not known how many defendants were sued or where the lawsuits were filed. The group also did not immediately make available a copy of the complaint. The lawsuits reportedly seek injunctions against the defendants (US copyright law also provides for penalties of up to $30,000 for each motion picture traded over the Internet, and up to $150,000 if such infringement is shown to be willful).

The MPAA is using a computer program that sniffs out movie and music files on a user's computer, as well as any installed file sharing programs. Information detected by this program could be used to remove any "infringing movies or music files" as well as removing file-sharing programs.

The IPKat observes that the tactic of pursuing individuals, first pursued by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), appears to be bearing fruit. The notion that downloads of commercially released recordings should be paid for by someone, somewhere, is becoming gradually more widely accepted by computer users, particularly now that a DRM culture is delivering music more quickly and cheaply to consumers than did the old over-the-counter sale of records, tapes, CDs and DVDs. But individuals have to be big enough nuisances before they
arer worth suing: for now, the small-scale infringers probably remain safe from legal action.

The hunter and the hunted? Click here, here and here
THE HUNTER AND THE HUNTED: MPAA SEEKS TO PICK OFF ITS QUARRY THE HUNTER AND THE HUNTED: MPAA SEEKS TO PICK OFF ITS QUARRY Reviewed by Jeremy on Tuesday, November 16, 2004 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. the World Wide Web is home to a great number of marketing opportunities that you could avail of,

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.