PENGUIN PIPPED; BLACKBERRY SQUASHED; US STOPS W(H)INING


*ZDNet Australia reports that the Australian Trade Marks Office has turned down an application by the Linux Marks Institute (which was set up by Linux creator Linus Torvalds) to register LINUX as and Australian trade mark because it is not distinctive. The Office said that for the mark to be accepted, the Institute had to show that the marks had an

'inherent adaptation to distinguish in the marketplace…In other words, it cannot be a term that other traders with similar goods and services would need to use in the ordinary course of trade."

The IPKat thinks he has spotted an Antipodean example of the “need to keep free” principle, beloved on the ECJ (most of the time), even though the Aussies are using it under distinctiveness rather than descriptiveness.


*Friend of the IPKat Edgar Forbes has tipped him off that a company is claiming that the Blackberry 7100 portable organiser device’s combination of a QWERTY keyboard and predictive typing infringes its earlier patent. The IPKat (who admitted isn’t skilled in any art) reckons this combination sounds pretty obvious. Coverage here.



*The BBC reports that the EU and US have reached agreement in their longstanding dispute over protection of wine names. The US will gradually stop using the names of European wines until it has completely phased their use out. In return, US wines will be given greater access to the EU market. The IPKat wonders whether a similar accord will be reached over the designations of origin of other foodstuffs (such as cheese) which the EU would like to “claw back”. He also wonders whether consumers’ perceptions of what these wine names mean with regard to geographical origin will keep in step with the changes.
PENGUIN PIPPED; BLACKBERRY SQUASHED; US STOPS W(H)INING PENGUIN PIPPED; BLACKBERRY SQUASHED; US STOPS W(H)INING Reviewed by Anonymous on Friday, September 16, 2005 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.