1 Calling all ambush marketing enthusiasts ...
The IPKat's friend and former LLM student Luca Egitto is doing some research in Torino (Turin), Italy, on ambush marketing and would appreciate some good leads. If you can recommend any articles or analyses of the subject, please let Luca know by emailing him here.
2 DNA and databases
Further to the debate initiated earlier this week over copyright in DNA sequences, IPKat friend Rob Harrison, based in Germany, writes:
"A German Court is highly unlikely to give protection to a copyright in DNA sequences. The German Copyright Act requires – except for computer programs – a level of creativity that is highly unlikely to be met here. There is no creativity in selecting the four letters (A,C,G and T) which make up the sequence.Yes, Merpel says, but not very printable ones ...
More interesting, in my opinion, is whether large databases of DNA sequences would be protectable under database rights legislation. My previous opinion was yes – however the various William Hill cases (which I have yet to study in detail) suggest that this might not be the case. Anyone with any thoughts?"
3 Are you Danish and really excited about copyright?
The bimonthly Sweet & Maxwell series, European Copyright and Design Reports , needs a new Danish correspondent. Your responsibility will be to let IPKat co-blogmeister Jeremy know about recent Danish copyright cases and to help him get hold of them, with a view to their being reported in this useful English-language series.
In return, you get (i) a complimentary subscription to the ECDR (the current UK and Europe rate is £360 (530.36 euro at today's rates), (ii) your name in each issue and (iii) occasional emails from Jeremy.
THIS is what the IPKat got when he did a Google Image search under the term 'Danish' and 'copyright'
Click here if you'd like to be considered or if you haven't seen the ECDR before and would like to inspect a sample issue.
REACTION WANTED, PLEASE!
![REACTION WANTED, PLEASE!]()
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Thursday, September 22, 2005
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html